We performed a comparison between Kaseya IT Center and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a product that is very easy to learn."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."
"Offers good patching."
"The tool's most valuable features are easy patch management and software deployment."
"SCCM is a stable solution."
"The solution is highly scalable."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager is integrated with other Microsoft products."
"The ability to make collections and deploy to them has been great."
"The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching."
"In Kaseya, agents are shown as offline at times, and it is an area that is being improved."
"At times, there is degradation in performance."
"It should provide the ability to remotely connect to mobile devices. There are some solutions that are doing that, but with Microsoft Intune, the only way to remotely connect to devices outside the organization and mobile devices is by using TeamViewer. It is pretty strange for a big company like Microsoft to not have something for that."
"In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."
"It is not easy to get good technical support, especially at level one."
"I would like to see more automation."
"There is no asset management package included."
"The solution can be improved with the addition of a mobile device manager."
"Its client interface should be more accessible, and the notifications should be more customizable from the console. It should be more user friendly and have some kind of customized notifications so that we can use it on the client side. These are the reasons why we restricted its use only for the server environment and didn't use it on the client side."
"It would be of benefit if Configuration Manager could be connected/integrated with multiple Microsoft Intune subscriptions rather than just one (the current limit)."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaseya IT Center is ranked 21st in Server Monitoring with 3 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. Kaseya IT Center is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kaseya IT Center writes "A tool that helps a user speed up the process of installation and automate certain processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Kaseya IT Center is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium. See our Kaseya IT Center vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.