Klocwork vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Perforce Logo
4,531 views|2,717 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Parasoft Logo
1,113 views|758 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Klocwork and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to create custom checkers is a plus.""Technical support is quite good.""Klocwork's most valuable feature is the static code analysis feature. It detects the potential problem earlier to allow the developer to receive feedback quickly and then address it before it becomes a problem.""I like not having to dig through false positives. Chasing down a false positive can take anywhere from five minutes for a small easy one, then something that is complicated and goes through a whole bunch of different class cases, and it can take up to 45 minutes to an hour to find out if it is a false positive or not.""We like using the static analysis and code refactoring, which are very valuable because of our requirements to meet safety critical levels and reliability.""The tool helps the team to think beforehand about corner cases or potential bugs that might arise in real-time.""On-the-fly analysis and incremental analysis are the best parts of Klocwork. Currently, we are using both of these features very effectively.""The reporting helps us understand the trend of our results and whether we improve over time. We can see the history within Klocwork's server architecture and know that we're making things better. It creates a great story for our management. We can demonstrate value and how our software is developing over time."

More Klocwork Pros →

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.""Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.""If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest.""Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally.""We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product.""We have seen a return on investment.""The solution is scalable.""Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros →

Cons
"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else.""This solution could be improved if they offered support of more languages including Ada and Golang. They currently only support seven languages.""I would like to see better codes between projects and a more user-friendly desktop in the next release.""Every update that we receive requires of us a lengthy and involved process.""I hope that in each new release they add new features relating to the addition of checkers, improving their analysis engines etc.""The way to define the rules is too complex. The definition/rules for static analysis could be automated according to various SILs, so as to avoid confusion.""Modern languages, such as Angular and .NET, should be included as a part of Klocwork. They have recently added Kotlin as a part of their project, but we would like to see more languages in Klocwork. That's the reason we are using Coverity as a backup for some of the other languages.""Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions."

More Klocwork Cons →

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time.""Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.""From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly.""Reporting facilities can be better.""Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times.""The performance could be a bit better.""The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.""Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."
  • "Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."
  • "The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."
  • "When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."
  • "Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."
  • "There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."
  • "The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."
  • "This solution offers competitive pricing."
  • More Klocwork Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."
  • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.
    Top Answer:Our purchasing department is responsible for tracking costs. It's one of the most widely used tools in our organization. It likely does not have a high price point. I don't have insights into… more »
    Top Answer:The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze. It will show all… more »
    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,531
    Comparisons
    2,717
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    850
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    1,113
    Comparisons
    758
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Coverity logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    Polyspace Code Prover logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    CodeSonar logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Also Known As
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    Overview

    Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

    Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

    SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

    Sample Customers
    ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL
    Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company50%
    Engineering Company10%
    Non Tech Company10%
    Transportation Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization39%
    Manufacturing Company19%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business52%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise46%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Klocwork is ranked 11th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 20 reviews while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 28th in Static Application Security Testing (SAST) with 30 reviews. Klocwork is rated 8.2, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Klocwork writes "Their technical team helps us get the most out of the solution, but we've faced some stability problems in our environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". Klocwork is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover, CodeSonar and Snyk, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover and ReadyAPI. See our Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

    See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.