We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."
"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."
"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"One of the best documentation in the world."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The price could be improved."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"The product must provide more integration."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 19 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 47 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 9.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and Perfecto, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and TestRail. See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
