We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and NetBrain based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The solution gives pretty good network visibility. I am also impressed with it's monitoring."
"Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."
"We use the solution to monitor links. It also helps us to track servers and monitor logs."
"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The solution is scalable."
"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."
"The product provides intensive reports."
"It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers."
"NetBrain is a very simple tool."
"A reliable, time-saving tool for providing accurate layer 2 and layer 3 network mappings."
"This product has good network monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities."
"Enables maps to be drawn out."
"Chain management is a good feature. I don't get it on other solutions."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive. I know that they just upgraded the product to make it a little bit easier to use, but compared to some of the other platforms, it is not easy to configure it, set it up, and get it running. However, once you have set it up and got it running, it runs great."
"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."
"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."
"Real user and UI monitoring are not practical."
"The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc."
"ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues."
"The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved."
"They should add more features to URL monitoring."
"It would be nice if the setup was a little simpler. Also, if the solution could provide more training materials for new people coming into our company so they can quickly learn how to use the functionalities."
"The solution could integrate more automation."
"Each device needs to be configured to allow NetBrain to poll for the information it needs, which can be very time-consuming for a large network."
"The IP interface brief isn't consistent."
"Support needs to improve for the installed product and some of the reporting could be more flexible to provide more complete cataloging."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews while NetBrain is ranked 15th in Network Troubleshooting. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0, while NetBrain is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetBrain writes "Good monitoring and troubleshoot capabilities, improves overall network traffic visibility". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and SCOM, whereas NetBrain is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, ThousandEyes, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager and Forward Enterprise. See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetBrain report.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
