Matillion ETL vs Snowflake comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Matillion Logo
3,247 views|2,215 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Snowflake Computing Logo
11,866 views|6,739 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Matillion ETL and Snowflake based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which is better for Snowflake integration, Matillion ETL or Azure Data Factory (ADF) when hosted on Azure?
Answer: Below is a comparison between Matillion ETL and Azure Data Factory for Snowflake integration when Azure Data Factory and Snowflake are hosted on Azure, based on feedback from others: If you are using Snowflake on Azure, Azure Data Factory may be a good choice because of its tight integration with Azure. If you need to perform complex data transformations, then Matillion ETL may be a better choice because it offers more powerful ETL functionality. If you are on a tight budget, Azure Data Factory may be a better choice because it is reportedly more affordable. Matillion ETL Pros: They say it is more powerful and flexible Reportedly has better support for complex data transformations May be easier to use and maintain Cons:Reportedly more expensive than Azure Data Factory Azure Data Factory Pros: Reportedly more affordable than Matillion ETL More tightly integrated with Azure Reportedly more scalable and reliable Cons: They say it is less powerful and flexible May not offer as much good support for complex data transformations May be more difficult to use and maintain Matillion ETL may be a better choice for organizations that need a powerful and flexible ETL solution, even if it may be more expensive. Azure Data Factory may be a better choice for organizations that need an affordable and scalable ETL solution, even if it may be less powerful and flexible.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the UI experience in which you can drag and drop most of the transformation.""It's been able to do everything we require.""It has good integrations with Amazon Redshift and other AWS services.""Matillion ETL is one hundred percent stable.""It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth""It takes less than five minutes to set up and delivers results. It is much quicker than traditional ETL technologies.""The product has a good user interface.""The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the ETL. The solution is open-source which provides advantages, such as good performance and high efficiency. Additionally, it supports three data types which eliminates predefining the data, and we can write script models in Python."

More Matillion ETL Pros →

"I like the idea that you can assign roles and responsibilities, limiting access to data.""The solution is stable.""My company wanted to have all our data in one single place and this what we use Snowflake for. Snowflake also allows us to build connectors to different data sources.""Snowflake is faster than on-premise systems and allows for variable compute power based on need.""It is very fast and the performance is great.""The product's most important feature is unloading data to S3.""The most valuable features are sharing data, Time Travel, Zero Copy Cloning, performance, and speed.""It is a cloud solution with many useful features. It has the data science capability. It can transform data and prepare data for a data science project with scalability."

More Snowflake Pros →

Cons
"I am looking forward to seeing the expansion of the source range for their data loader product.""I found some of the more complex aspects of ETL challenging, but I grasped the concepts fairly quickly.""Going forward, I would like them to add custom jobs, since we still have to run these outside of Matillion.""One of the features that's in development is data privacy in the cloud, along with further SAP integration. For connectivity to SAP systems.""The improvement area could be possible if the tool provides better integration capabilities with other ecosystems, including governance tools or data cataloging tools, as it is currently an area where the solution is lacking.""While the UI is good, it could be improved in its efficiency and made easier to use.""To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful.""When using the SQL loader type there were not a lot of pre-processing features for the data. For example, if there is a table with twenty columns, but we only want to load ten columns. In that case, we can use a security script to select the specific columns needed. However, if we want to perform extensive pre-processing of the data, I faced some challenges with Matillion ETL. I did not encounter many challenges, but my overall experience is limited as I only have three years of experience."

More Matillion ETL Cons →

"It needs a bit more rigor and governance, which is something you don't get with newer tools. This makes it less enterprise scalable. Its governance and structure can be enhanced, which would really be valuable. I would like to see some kind of prebuilt functionality in terms of having almost like a pre-built data warehouse. A functionality for generating automated kind of pieces would be good.""I see room for improvement when it comes to credit performance. The other thing I'd like to be improved is the warehouse facility.""Room for improvement would be writebacks. It doesn't support extensively writing back to the database, and it doesn't support web applications effectively. Ultimately, it's a database call, so if we are building web applications using Snowflake, it isn't that effective because there is some turnaround time from the database.""The complexity of the initial setup of Snowflake depends on the use case. However, Snowflake itself, we don't set it up. The difficulty comes from the ingestion patterns, depending on what data I'm putting in, what kind of enrichment, and what additional value we have to add. However, it does tend to get complex because we have a lot of semi-structured data which we need to handle in Snowflake. There have been some challenges.""There is room for improvement in Snowflake's integration with Python. We do a lot of SQL programming in Snowflake, but we go to a different tool to program when we have to in Python.""The scheduling system can definitely be better because we had to use external airflow for that. There should be orchestration for the scheduling system. Snowflake currently does not support machine learning, so it is just storage. They also need some alternatives for SQL Query. There should also be support for Spark in different languages such as Python.""Snowflake has to improve their spatial parts since it doesn't have much in terms of geo-spatial queries.""They do have a native connector to connect with integration tools for loading data, but it would be much better to have the functionality built-in."

More Snowflake Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I have heard from my manager and other higher ups, "This product is cheaper than other things on the market," and they have done the research."
  • "It is cost-effective. Based on our use case, it's efficient and cheap. It saves a lot of money and our upfront costs are less."
  • "The prices needs to be lower."
  • "It was very easy to purchase through the AWS Marketplace, but it was also expensive."
  • "Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace is pretty convenient. There is a little bit of back and forth in terms of the licensing based on the machine size, but it seems to have worked out well. it is convenient to have it all as part of our AWS billing."
  • "It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."
  • "The AWS pricing and licensing are a cost-effective solution for data integration needs."
  • "It was procured through the AWS Marketplace because it keeps things simple. They offer retail-like checkout and bill through your existing Amazon Web Services account."
  • More Matillion ETL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing can be confusing for customers."
  • "The whole licensing system is based on credit points. You can also make a license agreement with the company so that you buy credit points and then you use them. What you do not use in one year can be carried over to the next year."
  • "You pay based on the data that you are storing in the data warehouse and there are no maintenance costs."
  • "It is not cheap."
  • "The pricing for Snowflake is competitive."
  • "On average, with the number of queries that we run, we pay approximately $200 USD per month."
  • "Pricing is approximately $US 50 per DB. Terabyte is around $US 50 per month."
  • "The price of Snowflake is very reasonable."
  • More Snowflake Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand.
    Top Answer:The pricing depends on what edition the customer opts for. For example, a standard edition and then business critical of different editions. Each of those has a different cost per unit, which is… more »
    Top Answer:One of the features that's in development is data privacy in the cloud, along with further SAP integration. For connectivity to SAP systems.
    Top Answer:The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
    Top Answer:The real-time streaming feature is limited with Snowflake and could be improved. Currently, Snowflake doesn't support unstructured data. With Snowflake, you need to be very particular about the type… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    3,247
    Comparisons
    2,215
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    8.6
    1st
    out of 35 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    11,866
    Comparisons
    6,739
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    464
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery
    Snowflake Computing
    Learn More
    Overview

    Matillion ETL is a powerful tool for extracting, transforming, and loading large amounts of data from various sources into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake. Its ability to load data dynamically and efficiently using metadata is a standout feature, as is its open-source ETL with good performance and high efficiency. 

    The solution has a graphical interface for jobs, is easily adjustable and extensible, and allows for scheduling and error reporting. Matillion ETL has helped organizations move to a cloud-based solution, bridge the gap between on-premises and on-cloud, and perform complex migration projects.

    Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing solution for storing and processing data, generating reports and dashboards, and as a BI reporting source. It is used for optimizing costs and using financial data, as well as for migrating data from on-premises to the cloud. The solution is often used as a centralized data warehouse, combining data from multiple sources.

    Snowflake has helped organizations improve query performance, store and process JSON and XML, consolidate multiple databases into one unified table, power company-wide dashboards, increase productivity, reduce processing time, and have easy maintenance with good technical support.

    Its platform is made up of three components:

    1. Cloud services - Snowflake uses ANSI SQL to empower users to optimize their data and manage their infrastructure, while Snowflake handles the security and encryption of stored data.
    2. Query processing - Snowflake's compute layer is made up of virtual cloud data warehouses that let you analyze data through requests. Each of the warehouses does not compete for computing resources, nor do they affect the performance of each other.
    3. Database storage - Snowflake automatically manages all parts of the data storage process, including file size, compression, organization, structure, metadata, and statistics.

    Snowflake has many valuable vital features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Snowflake architecture provides nearly unlimited scalability and high speed because it uses a single elastic performance engine. The solution also supports unlimited concurrent users and workloads, from interactive to batch.
    • Snowflake makes automation easy and enables enterprises to automate data management, security, governance, availability, and data resiliency.
    • With seamless cross-cloud and cross-region connections, Snowflake eliminates ETL and data silos. Anyone who needs access to shared secure data can get a single copy via the data cloud. In addition, Snowflake makes remote collaboration and decision-making fast and easy via a single shared data source.
    • Snowflake’s Data Marketplace offers third-party data, which allows you to connect with Snowflake customers to extend workflows with data services and third-party applications.

    There are many benefits to implementing Snowflake. It helps optimize costs, reduce downtime, improve operational efficiency, and automate data replication for fast recovery, and it is built for high reliability and availability.

      Below are quotes from interviews we conducted with users currently using the Snowflake solution:

      Sreenivasan R., Director of Data Architecture and Engineering at Decision Minds, says, "Data sharing is a good feature. It is a majorly used feature. The elastic computing is another big feature. Separating computing and storage gives you flexibility. It doesn't require much DBA involvement because it doesn't need any performance tuning. We are not doing any performance tuning, and the entire burden of performance and SQL tuning is on Snowflake. Its usability is very good. I don't need to ramp up any user, and its onboarding is easier. You just onboard the user, and you are done with it. There are simple SQL and UI, and people are able to use this solution easily. Ease of use is a big thing in Snowflake."

      A director of business operations at a logistics company mentions, "It requires no maintenance on our part. They handle all that. The speed is phenomenal. The pricing isn't really anything more than what you would be paying for a SQL server license or another tool to execute the same thing. We have zero maintenance on our side to do anything and the speed at which it performs queries and loads the data is amazing. It handles unstructured data extremely well, too. So, if the data is in a JSON array or an XML, it handles that super well."

      A Solution Architect at a wholesaler/distributor comments, "The ability to share the data and the ability to scale up and down easily are the most valuable features. The concept of data sharing and data plumbing made it very easy to provide and share data. The ability to refresh your Dev or QA just by doing a clone is also valuable. It has the dynamic scale up and scale down feature. Development and deployment are much easier as compared to other platforms where you have to go through a lot of stuff. With a tool like DBT, you can do modeling and transformation within a single tool and deploy to Snowflake. It provides continuous deployment and continuous integration abilities. There is a separation of storage and compute, so you only get charged for your usage. You only pay for what you use. When we share the data downstream with business partners, we can specifically create compute for them, and we can charge back the business."

      Sample Customers
      Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc
      Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Manufacturing Company33%
      Financial Services Firm33%
      Healthcare Company8%
      Computer Software Company8%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company16%
      Financial Services Firm14%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      Government8%
      REVIEWERS
      Computer Software Company30%
      Financial Services Firm20%
      Healthcare Company6%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Educational Organization27%
      Financial Services Firm13%
      Computer Software Company10%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business22%
      Midsize Enterprise35%
      Large Enterprise43%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business19%
      Midsize Enterprise13%
      Large Enterprise68%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business25%
      Midsize Enterprise21%
      Large Enterprise54%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business15%
      Midsize Enterprise34%
      Large Enterprise51%
      Buyer's Guide
      Cloud Data Integration
      April 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
      770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews while Snowflake is ranked 1st in Data Warehouse with 92 reviews. Matillion ETL is rated 8.6, while Snowflake is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snowflake writes "Good usability, good data sharing and elastic compute features, and requires less DBA involvement". Matillion ETL is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas Snowflake is most compared with BigQuery, Azure Data Factory, Teradata, Vertica and Amazon Redshift.

      We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.