We performed a comparison between MetricStream and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."
"Key features are usability and ease of configuration. It allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."
"The solution has improved my organization by having everything combined to a single platform."
"The integrated data model of a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship is quite useful."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"The most valuable part of the product is the ease-of-use and the opportunity to create custom security applications easily."
"The solution has helped our organization manage our internal and external activities."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"The most valuable features are the advanced workflow and the dashboards. This tool can present data wonderfully to management, and it is easy for them to manage the risk plans."
"RSA Archer is a good tool and I have found performing the application, ISMS, and TPRM assessments beneficial."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."
"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."
"The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."
"Solution could use more inbuilt applications."
"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
"GUI could be improved."
"There should be a way to export and get data from the system in PDF or PowerPoint presentation format. This would be a great addition."
"In a future release, there should be an option to upload the main data."
"In terms of what can be improved, our client always says their user experience, IU/UX in RSA Archer. They found it is not as user friendly as other tools."
MetricStream is ranked 12th in GRC while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. MetricStream is rated 8.6, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MetricStream writes "Reasonably priced, stable, with out of the box deployment, and has good local support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". MetricStream is most compared with IBM OpenPages, OneTrust GRC and Workiva Wdesk, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard. See our MetricStream vs. RSA Archer report.
See our list of best GRC vendors, best IT Governance vendors, and best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.