We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and SonicWall Connect Tunnel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The product has valuable virtual machines, viability options, and enhanced VPN services, enabling the option to use it in different zones."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is its performance. It is very fast."
"All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable."
"It is a stable solution in our company, and we monitor critical health and performance parameters daily and weekly."
"The side-to-side connections are valuable."
"The interoperability with various firewall and access gateway vendors is one of this solution's most valuable features"
"It sends us a lot of detections when we have any anti-virus updates. It provides the extended time needed to update a set of time needs and notifications."
"It is easy to configure."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the advanced security features it offers."
"The best features are security and ease of use."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Microsoft could work on having micro VPNs to integrate with mobile devices."
"Considering my past interactions with Microsoft's support team, it is difficult to get the right support unless you find the right person to speak with from the customer support team."
"Make it completely routable, for example, if I have a gateway, I should be able to connect to whatever network I want on either side of the gateway, and the gateway should figure out which packet goes where."
"The solution must provide metrics to monitor the inbound and outbound traffic easily."
"The connectivity should be faster."
"In future releases, I would like to see the ability to inject BGP routes."
"Connectivity could be improved in Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway because it's not as stable, particularly when connecting a device tunnel."
"Their technical support could be better. If you don't have a support contract, it takes longer."
"The product's configuration, administration, and user interface are areas of concern."
"An improvement would be to update the look and feel of the interface, which is very traditional and doesn't fit the current market trend."
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 4th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews while SonicWall Connect Tunnel is ranked 16th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 8.2, while SonicWall Connect Tunnel is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "A scalable and reliable solution that enables users to connect to older protocols that other products do not have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall Connect Tunnel writes "Offers advanced security features and is easy to install". Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas SonicWall Connect Tunnel is most compared with SonicWall Netextender, Oracle VPN Connect, AWS Direct Connect, SonicWall SMA and Zyxel VPN Client. See our Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. SonicWall Connect Tunnel report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.