We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks."
"The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."
"The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."
"The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities."
"One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard."
"This solution's most useful feature is that it is entirely a single-page application."
"The solution works well."
"Rapid7 InsightVM has given us a practical view of the vulnerabilities present in our organization."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
"The discovery and prioritization of vulnerabilities."
"InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine."
"NeXpose is a pretty good vulnerability scanner... There's a nice dashboard."
"The ease of deployment and configuration allows users to onboard quickly."
"The general support could be improved."
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."
"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise."
"It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system."
"Integration can be improved."
"The reporting could be better."
"Patch management is the only missing feature I can think of. Rapid7 detects vulnerabilities, but it should also help you manage patches."
"The reporting is very bad when you compare it with other vulnerability assessment tools."
"We have some issues with how it scans patches."
"There are not enough templates, and the reporting is weak with this solution."
"Rapid7 could be easier to manage."
"All products have room for increased security and Rapid7 InsightVM is no exception."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 8th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender XDR, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightIDR and Wiz. See our Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Rapid7 InsightVM report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.