We performed a comparison between Microsoft Identity Manager and Transmit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM)."The most valuable feature in Omada is the governance. We work with other products and other product vendors, but the sweet spot in the market for Omada is where things are heavy on governance."
"When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now."
"For me, the best feature of Omada Identity is its web interface because it's really easy for users to understand."
"The key benefit of Omada Identity is maintaining complete control."
"The most relevant feature is Omada's reporting engine. Omada never 'forgets' and archives every process. All steps an admin, user, or manager has executed, are recorded in Omada."
"The customer success and support teams have been crucial."
"The best feature in Omada Identity is that it enables us to implement standardized employee life cycle processes so that we don't have to create them ourselves. We can then use the standard workflows. The breadth and scope of the solution’s IGA features also fulfill our requirements."
"Omada's best feature is creating accounts, automatically assigning permissions, and distributing resources based on assignment policies."
"It is a stable product. You will experience some issues with it, but it's a good product."
"Microsoft Identity Manager's documentation is good, and its end-user portal is user-friendly."
"The features that we find most valuable are security, mobility, and Single Sign-On."
"The product allows us to track the logins easily."
"Very powerful synchronization tool."
"I appreciate how Microsoft keeps adding new features to Microsoft Identity Manager."
"MIM's most valuable feature is its connectivity with Exchange."
"Microsoft integration products are strong. That is what I like about the product."
"Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless."
"Omada could communicate better with us about the product roadmap. We haven't gotten any updates about it. The user interface is often a bit difficult to understand. It isn't optimized for small screens, so it doesn't display all of the information clearly, so users need to scroll a lot."
"The backend is pretty good but the self-service request access screen, the GUI, needs improvement. It's an old-fashioned screen. Also, Omada has reports, but I wouldn't dare show them to the business because they look like they're from 1995. I know they are working on these things and that’s good, because they’re really needed."
"They need to improve the cost for small companies."
"It is not possible to customize reports on Omada Identity."
"The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides."
"In our organization, all the data is event-driven, which means that if an attribute is changed in the source system, it can be updated within a few seconds in all end-user systems. There is room for improvement in Omada regarding that. Omada is still batch-based for some processes, so sometimes it can take an hour or even four hours before the execution is run and the update is sent."
"Functionality and usability could be improved."
"Omada's reporting functionality is limited and could benefit from greater customization."
"It would be good if Microsoft Identity Manager Maybe could be integrated with Azure Active Directory directly and made as a cloud platform."
"The product could be more friendly for non-native English speakers. It would also be better if it were more intuitive and visually attractive."
"MIM's reliability could be improved."
"In terms of the identity and access management solution for on-premises environment, I think Microsoft needs to eliminate or minimize the number of workloads for the solution to run in on-premises environment."
"This product was only launched two or three years ago and it is still in the process of becoming stable."
"Microsoft Identity Manager could be more intuitive in terms of interface."
"The setup was difficult. The deployment process is not quick."
"Instead of using the connectors from the third-party companies, they should make the Microsoft templates available with this product. If Microsoft would increase the number of the box connectors that would be helpful to all the customers who use it daily."
"Pricing is an area where Transmit Security could improve. The pricing needs to be more competitive."
Microsoft Identity Manager is ranked 8th in Identity Management (IM) with 18 reviews while Transmit Security is ranked 18th in Identity Management (IM) with 1 review. Microsoft Identity Manager is rated 7.8, while Transmit Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Identity Manager writes "Constantly evolving while being a crucial feature for today's security needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Transmit Security writes "Good in terms of customization and security, offers flexible deployment, and easy to use". Microsoft Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Entra ID, Saviynt, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and Microsoft Entra ID Protection, whereas Transmit Security is most compared with ProofID IGA and HYPR.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
