We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"The addition of generics to handle common functionality across types, and the more recent upgrade of the dataset to the Entity Framework, has cut development time drastically, while increasing quality and confidence between builds."
"The most valuable features are the Domain Controller and the WBFS Manager."
"In-built refactoring and .Net profilers are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The most valuable thing about Microsoft .NET Framework is that it is an enterprise-grade language and platform."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"The .NET Framework is easier to use because it provides a wide range of libraries."
"In my opinion, the best thing about Microsoft .NET is the fully featured framework. It provides most of the things which a normal developer requires of any application out of the box."
"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."
"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."
"They could enhance support for Python within Visual Studio, as integrating Microsoft products with other frameworks can present a steep learning curve."
"The product's price is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"The cloud features must be improved."
"I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it."
"I would like more web integration."
"The product could have a better framework for application development."
"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."
"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."
More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 21st in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and NGINX Plus, whereas SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IBM DataPower Gateway. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.