We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."
"When we talk about .NET development, we use Visual Studio IDE to create these things. In recent years, there have been a lot of improvements in Visual Studio 2022. It would be a daunting task to list all of the features that have benefited us, as it would require a lot of time and effort. However, there are definitely many improvements year after year in .NET development."
"As we are a software company, we find that accessing resources using this technology is easier compared to the others."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"The most valuable thing about Microsoft .NET Framework is that it is an enterprise-grade language and platform."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."
"If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful."
"I would like to see a better response time from the technical support."
"One thing that could be improved is the tooling and IDE for .NET in non-Windows environments like Mac."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"The runtime environment for ASP.NET needs improvement to make it more universal."
"It is of great concern to us that the solution is not very powerful on cross platform, at it impedes the ability to build and scale with it."
".NET Is still heavy or dependant on other Microsoft libraries and frameworks."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"The stability of the solution needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and IBM WebSphere Application Server, whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.