We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"API management."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The stability could be better."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"Technical support needs to be better."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 41 reviews while OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 10th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors, best Cloud Data Integration vendors, and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.