We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."
"Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"The solution improved my company by modernizing the way we offer services and improving the user experience."
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"The ability to master the process in one location."
"It is stable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"The current version will not be supported for much longer."
"There are some issues with both stability and scalability."
"Community editions need more attention."
"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."
"From an improvement perspective, there should be fewer coding challenges for users in Mule ESB."
"In order to meet the new trend of active metadata management, we need intelligent APIs that can retrieve new data designs and trigger actions over new findings without human intervention."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. See our Mule ESB vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
