We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ESB, the enterprise service bus is what we primarily use. In addition to that, the API management. These are the two tools which we have been using extensively. The enterprise platform."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"One of the more valuable features is the stability of the platform."
"The most valuable features of the solution for securing APIs stem from the tool's ability to allow users to deploy policies."
"This is a good API management product."
"The entire offering and suite of tools that this solution provides have been very valuable. We are able to manage APIs on runtime on a cloud basis which has been very useful."
"Anypoint is very capable in terms of scalability."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to investigate APIs."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The solution is scalable."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The initial setup is very complex."
"The product's price should be available for public review since it is not currently available for others to see, making it one of the areas where the product has certain shortcomings."
"Rather than focusing on numbers, they should focus more on the customer support service."
"I would like to see more automation. Operations are done manually. It should also automate in the operation."
"Better documentation to help explain each of the features would be really helpful."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"The most important thing that should be improved is that it is too heavy."
"Monetization and cataloging can be improved."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 48 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.