We performed a comparison between MySQL and Oracle Multitenant based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution helps us perform with our databases and extract data."
"Setup is easy. MySQL of various flavours has community editions to easily test, deploy, and run."
"I am totally satisfied with MySQL."
"MySQL is an open-source product and has good community support. If you encounter any problem, you can easily ask other members of the community to help. They help you a lot. On top of being free, MySQL is a cross-platform database, meaning it can work on both Windows and Linux. It is very good for us."
"The most valuable feature of MySQL is its reliability and performance."
"The solution is free to use, which is its most valuable aspect."
"The IO segregation in CGE is valuable."
"It is very easy to install and has all basic database features."
"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."
"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"
"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."
"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."
"You can scale the solution as needed."
"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."
"It's easy to use and works great."
"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."
"It would be helpful if there were a graphical user interface to administer, configure, and tune it."
"The manuals or documentation could be better."
"While utilizing a comparable algorithm, is noted to be sensitive, especially when configuring the inner device."
"It could be a little bit simpler to use."
"The interface could be improved."
"When working with a cluster wide, I have to use the MySQL cluster version."
"The GUI could improve in MySQL."
"I find the Microsoft solution a bit better. But mostly in terms of the UI layout, I would say. I just find it a little bit more efficient."
"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."
"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."
"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."
"Technical support could be faster."
"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."
"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."
"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."
"The user interface for this solution can be made better."
MySQL is ranked 4th in Relational Databases Tools with 142 reviews while Oracle Multitenant is ranked 16th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews. MySQL is rated 8.2, while Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command ". MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Teradata and SAP HANA, whereas Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, IBM Db2 Database and SAP HANA. See our MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.