We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda and webMethods Integration Server. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
