We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Oracle VM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Virtualization Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect of this solution is that you don't need to pay for it, it's free, as opposed to paying for a VMware license."
"The support is excellent."
"It has a vs switch for the people who know Linux, in case it's easier for them to use AHV than it is to use VMware."
"The setup is efficient."
"With AHV, you can run micro-segmentation, which is, on the network security level, to have network virtualization across clouds."
"The interface is very good, and quite user-friendly."
"Nutanix is good for new implementations on the VM side. It's very good for disaster recovery and final storage."
"Using AHV, we have a built-in VR solution. It operates using a reduplication-based unique package transfer process."
"The support staff in the tech support team at Oracle has improved. I find them extremely helpful and they give very solid support."
"The product's initial setup phase was simple."
"In terms of server provisioning, it only takes a few clicks of a button and a bit of install automation."
"What I like the most is the failover and the quick restore of virtual machines."
"VMware is user-friendly, with clear integration and detailed migration."
"It is a stable product."
"The virtualization product Oracle puts out just complements the performance of the database."
"There's a lot of space to customize the solution if you need to."
"There are some issues with the interface and integration."
"There is no web interface with AHV."
"The software based controller has high consumption. This could be improved."
"VMware does tend to have more features than AHV. It's more of the leader in this space."
"Adding even more integrations would be an improvement."
"It should focus on providing more detailed and helpful error messages. One area we'd like to see enhanced is better support for guest VMs, especially in a heterogeneous environment."
"The solution's pricing could be improved."
"It would be better if the solution's replication to another site could be efficiently optimized."
"Integration with cloud products would be beneficial."
"It doesn't monitor everything, which is a little bit more difficult. It doesn't seem to have as many features or metrics to monitor as some others do, so you have to make some homemade scripts to do it."
"Oracle VM needs to add a backup feature."
"Productivity in Oracle VM could still be improved, and an additional feature to make the product better is compatibility with Kubernetes and other modern technologies."
"The management can be improved more, and become more agile. It would be nice for it to become more rich in terms of UI. In addition, the replication to disaster recovery needs improvement."
"Oracle VM should be promoted more as an open-source and stable software."
"The usage could be easier, and more user-friendly."
"An expanded data transfer option is one of the features I would like to have added."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 46 reviews while Oracle VM is ranked 7th in Server Virtualization Software with 78 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Oracle VM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM writes "A cheap option available for Linux environments which is useful for many workloads". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and XCP-ng virtualization platform, whereas Oracle VM is most compared with VMware vSphere, KVM, Oracle VM VirtualBox, Proxmox VE and Citrix Hypervisor. See our Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs. Oracle VM report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
