We performed a comparison between Odin Virtuozzo Containers and Proxmox VE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"The initial setup was really straightforward and easy."
"The solution has good high availability."
"The solution's maintenance part was very easy."
"KVM hypervisor is a valuable part of the solution."
"Proxmox VE has many containers. You need to download the image and do basic configuration, after which it is operational within a few minutes. The solution provides many containers that are light in use and don't use a lot of memory. You don't have to spend a lot of resources."
"We can access the product from iPhone 7. It is stable and easy."
"Saves a lot of time compared to imaging physical desktops."
"We are happy with Proxmox VE. We use it as part of a cluster."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"The solution needs a better billing system."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"The initial setup has a pretty steep learning curve."
"Proxmox VE can improve by importing OVF or OVA files directly from OVA. I need to convert all the images to raw images before importing them to Proxmox VE. If there is a solution that I can import directly from VMDK, it would be better."
"There should be a helm feature for managing Kubernetes ports directly from the Proxmox traffic interface."
"A feature which should be added is the ability to encrypt the main installation."
"Backup and recovery could be better. It's a bit problematic. If you're not well-versed with Linux, it tends to be a bit of a challenge when setting up and recovering. It's not really GUI-based, and if you're not a good Linux user, it becomes a bit difficult. In the next release, I would like to have something like Hyper-V's Data Protection Manager, where you could do an offsite backup and keep a copy. I haven't seen that incorporated yet, but I'm sure they will do that."
"The virtualization can be better."
Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews while Proxmox VE is ranked 1st in Server Virtualization Software with 58 reviews. Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0, while Proxmox VE is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proxmox VE writes "Easy to use and supports multi-monitors on multiple VMs in KVM". Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere, whereas Proxmox VE is most compared with VMware vSphere, Oracle VM VirtualBox, KVM and Nutanix AHV Virtualization.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.