We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols."
"Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways."
"The entire framework is very useful. It's easily integrable with Excel."
"The ease of record and playback as well as descriptive programming are the most valuable features of UFT (QTP)."
"The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation."
"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."
"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."
"The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"The document understanding is good."
"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."
"They should include AI-based testing features."
"The solution does not have proper scripting."
"One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement."
"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."
"Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function."
"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."
"The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on specialist resources."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."
"The test manager component could be improved."
"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."
"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."
"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and Ranorex Studio, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio, froglogic Squish and Opkey. See our OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
