We performed a comparison between OpenVPN Access Server and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The product provides secure internet connections and helps with faster downloads."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to implement."
"The product has strong encryption and scalability features. It provides security for private network connections."
"Two-factor authentication allows us to not force frequent password changes."
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"The product’s adaptability is valuable."
"OpenVPN Access Server is very stable."
"OpenVPN Access Server provides remote secure access."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"If there was a Graphical User Interface to help streamline the configuration, I believe OpenVPN would probably venture more into the non-geek realm as it were."
"We occasionally have internet issues which affect stability."
"There are certain shortcomings in the product's stability that need improvement."
"The solution can be more compatible with different operating systems."
"I would be more happy with the idea of licensing to have a reduced price with longer, grouped, annual fees. We have a lot of other software that does the same thing. It's a little higher price if you're going with a shorter stint, but there's a reduction in price for three- and five-year contracts."
"The solution should provide a faster connection, and its security could be improved."
"There was one annoying feature where we had to disable and enable the user. I cannot remember what it was exactly, but I think it was for a password lockout. It would be nice if there was a checkbox, or something, in the web interface to allow you to unlock a user whose password was locked."
"The product’s connectivity is very slow. It could be faster."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
Earn 20 points
OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 44 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. OpenVPN Access Server is rated 8.4, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "An easy-to-use tool with which its users can access networks from home or external locations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with . See our OpenVPN Access Server vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.