We compared PagerDuty and Opsgenie based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
PagerDuty and Opsgenie both offer efficient incident management and alerting systems, seamless integrations with various tools, and valuable customer support. PagerDuty is praised for its comprehensive reporting and analytics, while Opsgenie stands out for its effective on-call scheduling and customizable automation processes. Users find both products to have positive return on investment, however, PagerDuty requires enhancements in incident management and customization options, while Opsgenie could benefit from optimizing user experience and functionality. Additionally, PagerDuty users find its pricing, setup cost, and licensing favorable, whereas Opsgenie users appreciate the competitive pricing and flexible licensing options. Overall, each product caters to different needs in incident management, customization, and pricing structures.
Features: PagerDuty's valuable features include efficient incident management, alerting capabilities, integrations, customization options, reporting, and customer support. Opsgenie focuses on incident management, alert notifications, integration with monitoring tools, scheduling, process automation, customization, easy interface, and flexibility.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for PagerDuty has been praised for being straightforward and hassle-free, making the initial onboarding process easier. On the other hand, Opsgenie is known for its minimal setup expenses, providing users with a cost-effective solution., PagerDuty and Opsgenie both provide positive ROI. PagerDuty focuses on improving team communication and troubleshooting capabilities, while Opsgenie streamlines processes and enhances collaboration within teams.
Room for Improvement: PagerDuty has room for improvement in areas such as mobile app interface, incident management effectiveness, customization options for notifications, integration process with other tools, on-call scheduling simplification, and reporting capabilities. Opsgenie could benefit from enhancements to optimize user experience and functionality.
Deployment and customer support: Comparing the user reviews, PagerDuty users had varying experiences with the duration required for deployment and setup, with some having separate timeframes for each. In contrast, Opsgenie users mentioned that deployment and setup often occurred within the same timeframe for them., PagerDuty's customer service receives praise for its helpful and knowledgeable support staff. Users appreciate the efficiency and effectiveness of their prompt response. Opsgenie's customer support is commended for its responsiveness and competence, ensuring reliable assistance.
The summary above is based on 26 interviews we conducted recently with PagerDuty and Opsgenie users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically create a ticket for the support team when there is an alert."
"Opsgenie is easy to configure and use."
"The integration feature is the most valuable. It provides a lot of customizations for the integrations we use."
"This is a scalable solution. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability."
"Opsgenie integrates with Atlassian and other web monitoring and incident management tools."
"Opsgenie has streamlined our communications and alerting."
"The rotation and scheduling are beneficial."
"OpsGenie has many features, such as email notification, SMS notification, roster, tracking of the tickets. Automation, like scripting, is also possible. There are also features for maintaining the history of the tickets and all the solutions related to how it was resolved previously. If there are similar kinds of tickets, we can look at how a person is working on that ticket. If he doesn't have any idea, you can look back at a similar ticket and solve it as the previous person did it."
"The inbound integrations that PagerDuty provides with most of the DevOps tools are valuable."
"It has scaled well for us."
"PagerDuty's best features are the dedicated application that allows me to reach my engineers immediately and the ability to directly assign specific tasks to individuals and have them report back."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product has valuable on-call scheduling, escalation, and incident workflow management features."
"The alerts are immediate in this solution, which allows us to respond to errors quickly."
"PagerDuty let us set up rosters based on our shifts. We could assign a hierarchy for how the calls should be escalated and the number of times the call will be transferred between people before it is answered. It makes it easy to access an agent via mobile phone."
"A cool feature is that it helps us to understand the flow of the alert. If the alert was coming to the current on-call and he didn't catch the call or didn't notice it for any reason, it starts being escalated automatically, according to the escalation schedule, or to other teammates. You can see the flow very easily on your phone or via the website, if you want to do a post-mortem."
"I would like to see reports that can provide us with integration with Jira or with another management solution, which I'm not sure Opsgenie provides. The integration is possible, however as Opsgenie reports is an area that needs to be addressed. An alert is received, and Opsgenie will immediately generate a ticket or card for that issue, track it, and provide a follow-up. Opsgenie will also track an issue's whole life cycle. This is something that I would like to see in Opsgenie."
"I would like to see a little bit more work in API key management in the Opsgenie UI. It's a bit difficult to manage sometimes. For example, in terms of management, you can either see all the keys or none of the keys. This is something for which I would like to have better granularity so that I could give some people access to some of the keys. It's something that I don't have today if I'm not mistaken."
"The solution has room for improvement by providing bundle pricing with other products that are frequently used together from Atlassian."
"They could introduce many more features."
"It should have a lot of plugins. It should also come with cloud integrations, which are not that great with OpsGenie as of now. It should have AWS, Azure, and Google cloud integrations. It should also provide automation, that is, it should open somewhere, like orchestration. Something like the orchestration that ServiceNow is doing. That would be great. Orchestration is the main thing. If OpsGenie comes with stack down feature, not completely but some part of it, and orchestration is there, that would be beneficial."
"Initially, Opsgenie had bidirectional integration with Jira Service Management, but that functionality has been scaled back. Previously, Opsgenie was adept at managing incidents within its ecosystem, offering seamless ticket transfers between Opsgenie and Jira Service Desk. I valued the ability to push tickets between the two platforms, addressing the need for widespread information accessibility, though it sometimes led to duplication. My suggestion would be to reintroduce complete ticket funneling between these systems to streamline operations."
"We are using the cloud version of Atlassian products now, but I think the Data Center version we used earlier was much more user-friendly. There are lots of limitations in the cloud version The add-on or features that work with the Data Center versions are not compatible with the cloud version."
"When I needed to add the fourth guy to the on-call rotation, I had trouble finding the option in Opsgenie where I can add the new user. It took me some time to figure out because it it was very small. You have a pencil icon that you need to click, but it was so small and in a place that wasn't so obvious, so this is an area for improvement in the solution. I couldn't find the icon myself and my manager had to show me where it is. Opsgenie needs to be more user-friendly, particularly when it comes to finding the "Add New Users" option in the on-call rotation feature. Other than that, the solution was very easy to use, and you can see both the open and closed alerts."
"Because of the way you have to structure the rosters, if an engineer has to go on leave (or something), you can't just go in and reassign/take this person out of all of the different rosters that they're in. You have to go into each of the rosters and take them out. There might be a roster for business hours, after hours rotation, and monitoring deployments. Each time we need to take an engineer out of the pool, e.g., if they're sick or on leave, then we have to go and touch all of those rosters, updating and replacing them. Whereas, if we could just take the person out and have it automatically fill in the rostering, then that would make life a lot easier for managing it."
"The On-Call Teams feature could be better in terms of levels of conditions related to which team or member should get the responsibility of handling a matter or incident."
"The biggest area for improvement with PagerDuty is noise suppression. There have been a handful of incidents through our use of PagerDuty over the years where one incident may lead to 30 to 50 pages because you're monitoring all these different things, and each thing is an individual page. There should be the ability to set up paging tiers and group correlations between some of the different pages. That is something that would be really valuable. We should be able to say this one page may have a group or a tree of effective other pages that may tier off of it. So, if you see those pages independently, go ahead and alarm, but if you see this plus that, don't do that."
"The solution does not code all alerts correctly so sometimes you get false positives or multiple alerts for the same issue."
"PagerDuty's webhooks need some improvement."
"I would like to see more content in the notification messages; although, that might be a configuration on our end."
"Something that needs to be improved, is adding multilingual support."
"It cannot be integrated with our upgraded Jira system."
Opsgenie is ranked 2nd in IT Alerting and Incident Management with 14 reviews while PagerDuty Operations Cloud is ranked 1st in IT Alerting and Incident Management with 35 reviews. Opsgenie is rated 8.0, while PagerDuty Operations Cloud is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Opsgenie writes "The price is competitive and it's easy to use and configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PagerDuty Operations Cloud writes "Effectively generates alerts for incidents, making it suitable for 24/7 monitoring of infrastructure". Opsgenie is most compared with Splunk On-Call, xMatters , Everbridge IT Alerting and BigPanda, whereas PagerDuty Operations Cloud is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Splunk On-Call, Everbridge IT Alerting and xMatters . See our Opsgenie vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud report.
See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.