We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and Progress OpenEdge RDBMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Embedded Database solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can integrate it with any data sources as well."
"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."
"The solution's ROI is excellent."
"The scalability is very good."
"It accelerates query processing, which in turn speeds up operations and streamlines workflow, and ultimately enhancing productivity."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"
"Normally, every database server uses hard disks. In-Memory has a feature, apart from their database, which is very good. When we start our server, all your data needs loading memory. We can use that. It's a very good feature. I think they added this feature in 2019. We can mount memory in the partition, create partitions in there, and create table space from that spot to share. It's a really good feature. We use it a lot."
"I like Oracle because it is a backward-compatible solution."
"The product can be scaled in any direction and a very nice feature is that you can logically split the database by the value of the data, which is great."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The product could be more economical."
"They should lower the price. My customers think that it's too expensive."
"The platform’s pricing needs improvement."
"The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."
"The query optimization and backup features should be added."
"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."
"Advanced security would be a good additional feature."
"The only big hurdle for us is that most customers aren't familiar with it, so it's scary. If you're in commercial environments, everybody knows SQL, everybody knows Oracle, or whatever."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 2nd in Embedded Database with 27 reviews while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is ranked 5th in Embedded Database. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Progress OpenEdge RDBMS writes "Customizable, intelligent, and reacts in real-time". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, SQL Server, Apache Derby and kdb+, whereas Progress OpenEdge RDBMS is most compared with SAP HANA. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Progress OpenEdge RDBMS report.
See our list of best Embedded Database vendors.
We monitor all Embedded Database reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
