We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and Oracle Essbase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's user friendly."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"Some of the most valuable features are its real-time performance view/dashboard, metric history, real-time monitoring and alerts, as well as quick access to Oracle's tuning and diagnostic options."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager eight out of 10 for stability."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager has eased the responsibilities among our DBAs. We can now assign individual tasks to separate DBAs."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"The solution is scalable."
"It is highly efficient and easily scalable, particularly for handling large databases."
"It helps us fetch specific data sets per users' requirements."
"Essbase is extremely stable and low-maintenance."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Unlike relational, where you're linking together multiple tables, with Essbase, you basically define what the dimensions are beforehand, and you define the hierarchy, and then load the data. This allows you to do a pretty sophisticated analysis so that you can drill into it and slice and dice the data."
"I have found the most valuable aspect is the user-friendly environment and current features."
"The solution can handle a large volume of data."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"Better mobile access would be useful."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"It needs to support the Database versions lower than 10.2."
"The tool is expensive."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"The solution is not as simple as people say it is."
"Essbase has a programming language, and it has a couple of functions to do forecasting, however, their feature set for that is not that good."
"The initial setup is pretty complex."
"The ability to drive external reporting out for development could be improved."
"The initial setup could be simplified."
"They should improve the solution's performance."
"It's an expensive product to use."
"There is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness."
"I would like to see an integration with application performance management and a version control management tool."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews while Oracle Essbase is ranked 10th in Database Development and Management with 10 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while Oracle Essbase is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Essbase writes "It is easy to use and receives patch updates on regular intervals ". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas Oracle Essbase is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, SAP Analytics Cloud, Oracle Analytics Cloud and Tableau. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. Oracle Essbase report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
