We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the uptime of all of our systems to be most valuable with this solution. This is important because we need to guarantee specific uptime and preventive maintenance. We need to know upfront if there are going to be any issues on the database so we can proactively solve those."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager has eased the responsibilities among our DBAs. We can now assign individual tasks to separate DBAs."
"It is the best monitoring tool for Oracle databases."
"I mostly use the top events, and look at how the execution is happening on the database; and monitoring the cluster level rates. I even look at the execution plan."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"It's easy to implement as it's made by Oracle for Oracle."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"Power packs."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."
"It is simple."
"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
"Technical support could be faster."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"The product is pretty comprehensive, but quite resource hungry. This might be due to the majority of the application seemingly being written in Java."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"The solution is not as simple as people say it is."
"We have encountered performance issues when the load is huge."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."
"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."
"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"It was challenging onboarding users."
"They need a little more self-service."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 6th in Server Monitoring with 42 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Quest Spotlight, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and Zabbix. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.