We performed a comparison between Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very simple to configure, it's very simple to implement. In addition, the ability it has to capture data and transmit it with incredible speed is better than any of the product out there. It's extremely powerful."
"We use the tool to pull on-prem data."
"You can use Oracle GoldenGate as a DR for your system."
"This solution provides us with real-time replication and it does not affect the performance of other operations, which is very important to us."
"Data migration is the most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate."
"When we are replicating data between similar databases then it is straightforward."
"Oracle GoldenGate helps to select and target specific tables for replication. Any changes or operations on those tables are immediately reflected in the source and target environments."
"It is quite scalable."
"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."
"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."
"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."
"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."
"It would be better for Oracle Golden Gate Studio GUI to include other licensed products (i.e. Veridata or others)."
"The problem with GoldenGate is it is very complex to use. You need heavyweight skills to use it."
"The solution, in general, should be easier to use, with less need to perform workarounds within the system."
"Some issues regarding stability need to be resolved."
"The tool's connections are disconnected at times. The tool needs to integrate other databases."
"The process of transforming the data between two different databases is inefficient and needs to be improved."
"Microservices Architecture is not user-friendly."
"I find the user interface to be difficult for non-technical people."
"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."
"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."
"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."
Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while SAP Replication Server is ranked 27th in Data Integration with 6 reviews. Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2, while SAP Replication Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Replication Server writes "Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage". Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas SAP Replication Server is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Fivetran, SSIS, SAP Data Services and Azure Data Factory. See our Oracle GoldenGate vs. SAP Replication Server report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.