We performed a comparison between Percona Server and PostgreSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Open Source Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We find the product mostly stable."
"I like that you can move any relational database from Oracle to PostgreSQL. I also like that it's pretty stable."
"Clustering will be the number 1 feature. It is also open-source so it is free. It can also be clustered, to allow fault tolerance."
"The solution is open-source and free to use."
"One of the most valuable features is real-time data capture; it optimizes database performance. I think using real-time data capture reduces job running time and the amount of data sent at once with batch loads."
"It is a pretty comprehensive database system. Its performance is good, and it does what it is supposed to do. It also integrates very well."
"It's a standard reliable database management system."
"With the database, you can provide a multi-component at the same service with the same performance, scalability, or all those things."
"It's quite scalable."
"If Percona had flashback capabilities, it would be ideal."
"The interface climate could be better."
"The performance of PostgreSQL could improve."
"PostgreSQL’s performance could be improved."
"It could be improved by using parallelization. You want basically, distributed computing."
"The solution could improve the integration."
"I had some issues when I integrated with the Jupyter Notebook."
"Sometimes, the views create problems. If you don't have the view, sometimes what happens is you need to have the drivers properly set up for PostgreSQL."
"It is possible that in the newer version this has been addressed, but I would like the deployment in microservices architecture could be improved."
Percona Server is ranked 9th in Open Source Databases with 2 reviews while PostgreSQL is ranked 2nd in Open Source Databases with 123 reviews. Percona Server is rated 7.6, while PostgreSQL is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Percona Server writes "Open-source and free to use with a good community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PostgreSQL writes " Real-time data capture optimizes database performance but Views create problems". Percona Server is most compared with MariaDB, MySQL, EDB Postgres Advanced Server and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, whereas PostgreSQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, EDB Postgres Advanced Server, MySQL, MariaDB and LanceDB. See our Percona Server vs. PostgreSQL report.
See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
