We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"The grids, as well as the selectors, are the most valuable features."
"There is a supportive community around it."
"Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run."
"The plugins, the components, and the method of the library with Selenium is very user defined."
"I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good."
"The main characteristic that is useful is that the tool is completely free."
"It is very stable."
"I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"The solution can be improved by providing better reporting logs."
"Selenium HQ can be complex. The interface requires a QA engineer or an expert to use it."
"For email-based applications, we can't automate as we would like to, making it necessary to bring in a third-party product to do so."
"I have found that at times the tool does not catch the class features of website content correctly. The product's AWS configuration is also hard."
"It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements."
"Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way."
"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install."
"I would like to see some reporting or test management tools."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with OpenText UFT One and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.