We performed a comparison between SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and SentinelOne Singularity Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software."Great product to manage the access control of users."
"The solution’s stability and performance are good."
"The tool is quite stable and user-friendly."
"The level of customization for data imports and role modeling, because it helps to integrate faster, support easier and let it reuse the organization role structure."
"This solution is great for providing control access across your environment."
"Certifications and user provisioning features are the most valuable."
"It is simple and easy to implement."
"The tool's GUI is user-friendly."
"The AI-based detection, scanning, prevention and mitigation features are the most valuable features."
"SentinelOne Singularity Identity is very lightweight as an agent or software."
"The most valuable feature of SentinelOne Singularity Identity is its ability to detect based on behavior rather than just static signatures."
"Having high visibility into all of our network concerns and a customizable UI are the most valuable features."
"While I've experience with many CSPM solutions, SentinelOne Singularity Identity stands out."
"The biggest value for us is getting a much better picture of what our risks are."
"I like the detection and protection features. We don't need to do anything, and it will alert us when the mitigation is not successful. We only need to target those endpoints. Otherwise, we don't have to do anything about that."
"One of the top things we're interested in is cloud protection."
"Scalability is hard, especially when you are doing it in real time."
"In the past, we had a lot of problems with SailPoint IdentityIQ, particularly in providing access and provisioning. There were some gaps in the operation of the solution because they were manual rather than automated, and the users and administrators were given access directly via Active Directory, and it wasn't appropriate for us at the time to use. In terms of integration, we could provide a more automated solution after a minimum number of years, but not in the SailPoint IdentityIQ platform, but there were problems in the registration, for example, with putting information inside ADP, but in general, we were able to solve those problems, and after implementing SailPoint IdentityIQ we had increased evaluations."
"When it comes to queries and analysis, I find the reporting module to be very low, very simple."
"I would like to see more Cloud management from this product."
"If there's a price reduction for SailPoint IdentityIQ, that would be helpful. Another area for improvement in the product is the technical support, which needs to be more friendly to customers."
"They can work on their strategy for the on-premise version. They have to decide whether and for how long they will support the on-premise version. The new features first appear in the cloud, and after that, they are released for the on-premise version. In the cloud, you have more options and flexibility, which is absolutely normal. They have to have a clear strategy regarding whether they'll support the on-premises version with the same focus. The licensing for on-premise and cloud is a little bit different. They can make it the same."
"They should lower the price and technical support should be better."
"The connectors should be improved."
"Sometimes I get kicked out of the console. I don't know why."
"The alerts take four hours to generate in our AWS console."
"I don't like SentinelOne's reporting tools. Their reports seem fine theoretically, but the issue is the sample size. For example, it will report that there were four incidents, and that equals 25 percent fewer incidents compared to the previous months. It would be a great improvement if I could expand the range to see reports for the last six months, but it's always one month. That would be an easy thing for them to resolve."
"Our company has different locations, such as Sunbury, Oklahoma, and Alabama. I have my devices by location, and I have not found a way to choose all the endpoints and then push the update automatically. I have been doing it one by one."
"The primary reason for this discontent is that we frequently encounter performance issues with our servers."
"The policies could be more precise, and Singularity should use more templates like alternative solutions have. Endpoint management is poor. We cannot manage individual endpoints and must rely on policies, exclusions, or block lists to apply settings to a group instead of the individual agent. If I have to make settings for one computer, I need to create a group, apply the configuration, and move the agent there. It's challenging to manage endpoints that way."
"The root cause of automation could be better."
"A lot of those features came from an acquisition of a different company."
More SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 62 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Identity is ranked 9th in Vulnerability Management with 15 reviews. SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is rated 8.2, while SentinelOne Singularity Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SailPoint Identity Security Cloud writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Identity writes "It offers deep and continuous visibility into our attack surface". SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Microsoft Identity Manager, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Identity is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Microsoft Entra ID Protection.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.