SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management vs SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
7,722 views|6,293 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good."

More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pros →

"It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint.""It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows.""Information is much more readily available.""What I like about SharePoint is that they keep up with a lot of updates, and they bring out new features. I also like that the system is integrated with the Microsoft 365 suite of apps.""It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place.""The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows.""SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible.""The product provides flexibility in collaboration."

More SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Cons →

"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc.""The product must provide more automation.""The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control.""There are some limitations on storage.""It will fully use your system resources.""Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents.""It should have a Google-caliber search ability and a model-based GUI.""It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."

More SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good.
    Top Answer:The prices can vary depending on the customer, region, and domain. I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.
    Top Answer:The product's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required. The tool could be made a bit more… more »
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    330
    Comparisons
    286
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    725
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    7,722
    Comparisons
    6,293
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    526
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management by OpenText, SAP Extended ECM
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Overview

    A digital core built on the SAP HANA business data platform and integrated applications for content management comprise the next-generation business model to complete your digital transformation and help you manage unstructured content as part of the business transactions more effectively while facilitating collaboration and storing content to avoid redundancies, minimize information growth, and support regulatory compliance. The SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management application by OpenText helps you engage customers with a 360-degree view of their profile and optimize procurement processes, employee productivity, process efficiency, and equipment ROI.

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Sample Customers
    Metropolitan Utilities District, MAN Diesel & Turbo
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is ranked 14th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is rated 9.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management writes "A stable tool with good integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager and IBM ECM, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.