We performed a comparison between SAP Master Data Governance and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A good solution for large enterprises."
"SAP Master Data Governance is a customizable solution and is flexible."
"Some of the features that I have found to be beneficial are the search and uploads functions."
"The most valuable thing is what it does: data management."
"The scalability is very good."
"We've managed tens of thousands of updates within 30 to 60 minutes, and we can also replicate these changes to all connected systems."
"Validates all aspects from security to authorization and authentication."
"The solution is great at standardizing all of our records."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."
"The data quality is very good."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are the workflow and interface."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are that is a complete tool and everything can be done inside, including data governance. We are able to model everything according to the needs of the company. If the company needs five people to agree to a change in data, they can do it with TIBCO EBX. They can model it with any particular rules. Additionally, there is dynamic data modeling, simple workflows using the GUI that comes from the server."
"The data modeling is very good."
"The tool's UI is good and easy to understand."
"The documentation provided for the MDG extensions by Utopia could be improved."
"Overall, they just a little bit more flexibility in terms of assigning roles or adding new roles. We have a longer approval process, so we need to break it down into more roles than what is typically available and we need to hard-code it."
"The multidomain MDM feature is based on EIP systems, which may not be a good model for all master data."
"The user experience can be improved."
"The UI could improve by being more neat and clean. Sometimes users find it difficult to use it."
"They should improve the solution's performance as sometimes the process consumes much time."
"The solution lacks some flexibility."
"There were challenges with handling multiple values within a single input field at the screen level."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"The tool has to improve mapping and workflow. It should be made more robust."
"The product does not scale well horizontally. We find the scalability to be quite inferior to other options."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
"The documentation needs improvement."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"The support isn't great and takes too long. And the pricing can be improved."
"Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX."
SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 1st in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 22 reviews while TIBCO EBX is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 14 reviews. SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.8, while TIBCO EBX is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Provides efficient technical support services, but it could be more affordable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO EBX writes "Good workflow models and pull-down lists with very good data modeling". SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Informatica MDM, Microsoft MDS, Reltio Cloud, IBM InfoSphere MDM and Semarchy xDM, whereas TIBCO EBX is most compared with Informatica MDM, Reltio Cloud, Stibo STEP MDM, Microsoft MDS and Informatica PIM. See our SAP Master Data Governance vs. TIBCO EBX report.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
