We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."
"The management console is the most valuable feature."
"PingSafe released a new security graph tool that helps us identify the root issue. Other tools give you a pass/fail type of profile on all misconfigurations, and those will run into the thousands. PingSafe's graphing algorithm connects various components together and tries to identify what is severe and what is not. It can correlate various vulnerabilities and datasets to test them on the back end to pinpoint the real issue."
"The visibility is the best part of the solution."
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"PingSafe stands out for its user-friendly interface and intuitive software, making it easy to navigate and use."
"With PingSafe, it's easy to onboard new accounts."
"The key strength of Singularity Cloud Security lies in its ability to pinpoint vulnerabilities in our cloud accounts and identify suspicious activity that warrants further investigation."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"While it is good, I think the solution's console could be improved."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"I export CSV. I cannot export graphs. Restricting it to the CSV format has its own disadvantages. These are all machine IP addresses and information. I cannot change it to the JSON format. The export functionality can be improved."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"PingSafe takes four to five hours to detect and highlight an issue, and that time should be reduced."
"Some of the navigation and some aspects of the portal may be a little bit confusing."
"SentinelOne currently lacks a break glass account feature, which is critical for implementing Single Sign-On."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"The pricing can get high."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Container Security with 81 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 18 reviews. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Sysdig Secure, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and AWS Security Hub. See our SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
