We performed a comparison between Snowflake and TIBCO Live Datamart based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Snowflake is its performance. We can access the data quickly. Additionally, it handles structured and non-structured data."
"The way it is built and designed is valuable. The way the shared model is built and the way it exploits the power of the cloud is very good. Certain features related to administration and management, akin to Oracle Flashback and all that, are very important for modern-day administration and management. It is also good in terms of managing and improving performance, indexing, and partitioning. It is sort of completely automated. Everything is essentially under the hood, and the engine takes care of it all. As a data warehouse on the cloud, Snowflake stands strong on its ground even though each of the cloud providers has its own data warehouse, such as Redshift for AWS or Synapse for Azure."
"The most valuable feature has been the Snowflake data sharing and dynamic data masking."
"It is quite easy to manage."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power."
"The cloning functionality has been the most valuable. I have been able to completely copy databases. The data sharing concept is also useful. As compared to, for example, SAP, Snowflake is a lot more open, and it allows a lot more connectivity for other providers than an SAP ecosystem."
"The solution speeds up the process of onboarding."
"The solution has a powerful aggregating feature"
"You can create your own rules that include mathematic calculations."
"The cost of the solution could be reduced."
"There is a scope for improvement. They don't currently support integration with some of the Azure and AWS native services. It would be good if they can enhance their product to integrate with these services."
"It's difficult to know how to size everything correctly."
"Snowflake has support for stored procedures, but it is not that powerful."
"Sometimes it can be tricky to manage multiple environments if you're purely using Snowflake as your scripting and pipeline environment."
"The solution should offer an on-premises version also. We have some requirements where we would prefer to use it as a template."
"Snowflake needs transparency over costs and pricing."
"In future releases, it can also support full unstructured data."
"The solution's setup could be quicker and easier."
"Improvements need to be made on the load balancing side."
Snowflake is ranked 1st in Data Warehouse with 92 reviews while TIBCO Live Datamart is ranked 12th in Data Warehouse with 2 reviews. Snowflake is rated 8.4, while TIBCO Live Datamart is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Snowflake writes "Good usability, good data sharing and elastic compute features, and requires less DBA involvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Live Datamart writes "Standout features are real-time dashboards and powerful aggregation". Snowflake is most compared with BigQuery, Azure Data Factory, Teradata, Vertica and AWS Lake Formation, whereas TIBCO Live Datamart is most compared with . See our Snowflake vs. TIBCO Live Datamart report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors and best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.