We performed a comparison between SolarWinds NPM and Spiceworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are a lot of valuable features with SolarWinds NPM. We can receive a lot of detailed data from the monitoring that can use useful for investigations, especially when you are troubleshooting. It is very helpful. Overall it was a very good experience."
"It's a very good tool and a very stable tool."
"SolarWinds dashboard is very fast. Also, their interface is very good, it looks very user-friendly. The product allows me to see a summary of the network being monitored at a glance."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical user interface."
"Network performance is the main issue clients are facing. SolarWinds checks if a node is down, and we can set thresholds for performance metrics. For example, we set it up to get an alert automatically if a value is over 80 percent. It has a full dashboard that covers CP, hard disk, and node monitoring."
"It is very extensible with 'SWQL' and APIs to where we are beginning to integrate it with network automation."
"The product is lightweight in terms of memory use, requiring only 10 megabytes or less."
"The initial setup was straightforward. We deployed the solution from new and completed the upgrades."
"Tickets by e-mail, with actions by hastag."
"The solution is very stable. It's reliable and efficient."
"Spiceworks' dashboard allows you to drill down to the notes, where I can take an inventory of the network and see the devices I need to monitor."
"The most valuable features are the inventory and personalization."
"The solution is easy to use and easy to manage."
"The solution can find all asset details automatically, whether it's a Mac address, computer name, IP address, models, etc. It's very helpful."
"It shows the users that are currently logged in, which is not something that Active Directory by default will ever let you know up front."
"Spiceworks is generic and free."
"SolarWinds NPM could improve by adding the deepest inspection, performance networking, and IP address discovery."
"GUI needs improvement with a more graphical dashboard."
"Complex and overly detailed setup."
"The evaluation time for the product is too short especially for large corporations."
"The solution needs to integrate with additional SDN technologies that are part of the hyper market."
"The reporting module that got integrated into the system itself, used to be a standalone solution and I preferred that."
"The solution could be more secure."
"Real-time analytics is the major weakness of the SolarWinds NPM platform today. They've done a fantastic job enabling the collection of data. Users are now demanding the ability to generate their own graphs, views, and so on; all of this must be done by an admin today."
"I would like the solution to allow for more direct interaction with computers. I can open tickets and I can see their status, but I can't interact directly with the computers themselves."
"I would like to see more information when drilling down into access permissions, assignments management, or tagging. When I click a note or a device, I should be able to see more details about the router and modem. For example, I want to see the version, downtime, availability, latency, etc. I should have easy access to everything about our assets at a glance."
"One of the biggest ways in which Spiceworks could improve is by developing better and more automated workflows. For example, in another solution called ServiceDesk by ManageEngine, you can have levels of approval in the event that there is a request for new software, or when someone requests a VPN or WiFi connection. This kind of multi-stage approval feature provided by ServiceDesk does not appear to exist in Spiceworks, and it is one of their main shortcomings for me."
"The network mapping could be improved. Putting together an actual bonafide network map would be really nice."
"The GUI must be improved."
"There are a lot of disadvantages to Spiceworks because it's not an agent-based solution."
"Having an integrated asset management tool, where I can plug in things that are offline, would be good."
"Once a device was recognized on the network, Spiceworks never got rid of it even after you took it off the network. You had to go in and manually remove it."
SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 147 reviews while Spiceworks is ranked 33rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 47 reviews. SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2, while Spiceworks is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spiceworks writes "Good low-cost service desk system, but lacks in automation workflows and categorization ". SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and Entuity, whereas Spiceworks is most compared with Zabbix, Lansweeper, ServiceNow, Freshdesk and SysAid. See our SolarWinds NPM vs. Spiceworks report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.