We performed a comparison between SSIS and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SSIS' most valuable feature is its reporting services."
"The data reader is the most valuable feature."
"It is also easy to learn and user-friendly. Microsoft is also good in terms of technical support. They have built a large community all over the world."
"The setup is straightforward. It's very easy to install."
"It's something I needed for bulk imports. I'm not a big fan of it, but I haven't seen anything better."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the fast insert and fuzzy logic matching."
"I have found its most valuable features to be its package management capabilities and the flexibility it offers in designing workflows."
"The ability of SSIS to transform and transport data is extremely valuable to me. It allows for intelligent extraction and manipulation of data during the process. Improved error handling would enhance ETL processes further. I haven't directly utilized the data flow components but they seem capable of supporting complex data integration needs."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The solution is scalable."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The performance of this solution is not as good as other tools in the market."
"Improving the login procedure would make our reporting easier on monitoring our ETL processes."
"We'd like more integration capabilities."
"The solution should work on the GPU, graphical processing unit. There should also be piping integration available."
"I would like to see more standard components out of the box, such as SFTP, and Data Compression components."
"There is connectivity with other databases, however, this is the most significant issue that has to be addressed."
"Generic processes should be used instead of custom code for each table."
"A change in the metadata source cripples the whole ETL process, requiring each module to be manually reopened."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"It is difficult to maintain."
SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. SSIS is rated 7.6, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee and Microsoft Azure API Management. See our SSIS vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
