We performed a comparison between Telerik Test Studio and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."
"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."
"The way it identifies elements is good."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."
"The performance and load testing are very good."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"The most valuable features of Visual Studio Test Professional are the IntelliSense and the ease of adding the NuGet packages."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."
"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."
"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."
"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."
"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."
"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"Its UI could be better."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Telerik Test Studio is ranked 18th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 47 reviews. Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "Very good performance and load testing capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Apache JMeter, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise. See our Telerik Test Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
