We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Apex One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Trellix Endpoint Security is highly valued for its easy administration options and reliability. Trend Micro Apex One stands out for its centralized reporting, efficient policy implementation, and a diverse array of features including DLP, encryption, and patch management. Reviews suggest that Trellix could reduce resource consumption and improve user-friendliness. Trend Micro Apex One users say the platform should improve its compatibility with different operating systems and address performance issues. Users also say the reporting, forensic analysis, and ransomware features could use some work.
Service and Support: Some users have found the support for Trellix Endpoint Security helpful and reliable, while others have encountered ineffective assistance and communication problems. Trend Micro support generally earned positive reviews, but some said that support could be more proactive and respond faster.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Trellix Endpoint Security varies in difficulty, depending on the user's experience with McAfee and general technical expertise. Most users thought Trend Micro Apex One was easy to set up, but a few said that it’s more complex than competing solutions.
Pricing: Some find Trellix’s price reasonable and competitive, while others believe it could be lowered. Some considered the price of Trend Micro Apex One to be fair, while others found it expensive.
ROI: Trellix Endpoint Security provides significant time savings. Trend Micro Apex One provides extra cost-effective advantages and safeguards vital information.
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The solution offers very good endpoint security."
"Tech support is responsive. They're good, the very best."
"Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust access protection, addressing major concerns in prevention. It provides both application control and user access control within its access protection features."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."
"The solution is stable."
"A big advantage of McAfee Endpoint Security is the ability to manage very big environments. We are supporting environments with 200,000 to 300,000 endpoints. The ability to manage with one single console is very important for us. McAfee has phenomenally improved in terms of detection. It provides real-time detection and response with the error, Real Protect, and reputations. It is not only based on signatures but also on behavior analytics, artificial intelligence, or machine learning. We have environments that never had issues with ransomware in the last 20 years. McAfee has a very good performance in this field."
"It also allows multifunctionality within a single platform."
"The nano protection and device control are great."
"It is very stable. It also has good security capabilities. It is a strong security product for endpoint protection."
"Web reputation and behavior monitoring are valuable features, as they allow us to control which websites users can visit and download from, and to protect against ransomware."
"We don't use application control but instead, we use behavior monitoring, which is a good feature. The real-time scanning, data loss prevention, and endpoint sensor we use are beneficial"
"I think this is the best solution in the category of endpoint protection, it's really excellent. It's better than McAfee."
"The end user perspective is very good because the solution isn't complex to learn and support is readily available."
"Workload security now has a feature called Activity Monitor for each endpoint."
"The most valuable aspect is achieving zero attacks and zero data compromise."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The price of the solution is high in Asia."
"It would be nice if the solution was a bit more stable."
"Some agents become old and then they don't communicate well any longer."
"The solution needs to offer better local technical support."
"Technical support from the vendor is very bad."
"While we are pleased with the endpoint solution, there should also be a separate one for the firewall."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
"I think it would be nice if Dynamic Application Control would come together with McAfee Endpoint Security."
"When I create and implement a new policy , it takes a couple of hours to apply to the devices."
"Some of our customers need to add cache file signatures in Trend Micro Apex One, but it is currently not a supported feature."
"It has good signature-based capabilities, but features like “shape detection” can be improved upon."
"Sometimes it will not communicate with the server, and we need to manually restart items."
"The solution can be improved to utilize fewer system resources, like memory and hard disk, during scanning."
"We have received many complaints about how slow the system is on the first day of implementation."
"The solution could improve by making the interface less confusing, it needs to be simplified."
"I would like to see behavior analysis capabilities included."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 125 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.