We compared Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: When comparing Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, it is generally believed that Deep Security has a simpler and more straightforward initial setup. Deep Security also offers a wider variety of deployment options and provides helpful documentation and video tutorials. Conversely, Carbon Black Endpoint's setup can be more difficult, requiring complex configurations and customized policies. However, Carbon Black Endpoint has advantageous features like MDR capability and a whitelisting process for protection against zero-day threats. Deep Security has a smaller impact on system resources and efficient threat detection, whereas Carbon Black Endpoint offers superior log analysis and continuous monitoring. Some customers find Deep Security's pricing to be high, while Carbon Black Endpoint is generally described as expensive. The quality of customer service for both products has received mixed reviews and has room for improvement.
"The file integrity and log inspection are game-changing features for us."
"The initial setup was straightforward and we didn't have any problem with it."
"Virtual patching is a wonderful feature where we do a recommendation scan and an internal assessment on the server, and it updates the IPS signatures to block any attack. I have seen instances where it has prevented attacks on the end-of-support servers such as 2018 R2, and many years ago, even 2007 servers that were end-of-support. It certainly helped there."
"It helps with virtual patching and IDS fetching."
"The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment was good. We haven't had any problems at all."
"It integrates well with the cloud; for example, AWS, and Google Cloud Provider."
"Some of the main features of this solution are it is reliable and can be used in small to large size businesses."
"It is stable and we have not faced any challenges during the rolled out"
"It is stable and easy to set up."
"Once the solution is installed and configured correctly it does not require a lot of hands-on attention until you need upgrading."
"The software uses very few resources; it is almost invisible to the end user."
"It has the best live response feature."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The most valuable feature is that it detects and stops malicious executables."
"It has intelligent learning behind it and we have been very successful in preventing attacks."
"The solution has a very nice API on the back end for remoting into a system and executing scripts or utilizing self automation."
"Their support should be improved. We need support in the UAE, but it is always going to some other country or region, and the time schedule is not suitable for us."
"The updates for legacy systems are not rolled out frequently."
"The licensing structure could improve."
"The initial setup needs improvement, as it was a bit challenging."
"We'd like to have more application control."
"The situation with the currency in Turkey makes this solution a little bit on the expensive side, and if it were lowered then it would be more competitive."
"Trend Micro is scalable if you have the budget for it."
"Post-implementation is time-consuming. You have to do monitoring, and that takes time. After you set up everything, it's not a full-fledged implementation. You have to keep on monitoring and configuring."
"It would be a better solution if Carbon Black Cb Defense had an on-promise solution and a virus auto delete or quarantine."
"Performing a malware scan usually takes a lot of time, more than 24 hours."
"The solution needs expanded endpoint query tools."
"I am not sure whether Carbon Black CB Defense can be considered as a stable solution or not."
"But here, we hardly can take any kind of a report out of Carbon Black, so I think that should be something that should be more user-friendly."
"Carbon Black has limited capability to integrate with Rapid7."
"It is difficult to extract reports for ongoing scans"
"With the on-prem one, the bug has been reported by the community in early January or February, something like that, at the beginning of the year, and it's still not addressed. They have released two versions since then, and yet neither of them addresses this specific issue."
Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 16th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 62 reviews. Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.