We performed a comparison between Tricentis NeoLoad and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution."
"The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution."
"I would rate it as eight out of 10 for ease of setting up."
"The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool."
"There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis."
"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."
"Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"The reporting is really nice."
"Object Identification Wizard."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other tools. Though the product’s reports are accurate, it needs to be more detailed like other tools."
"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its integration with third-party tools because, at the moment, it's a bit complicated. Per Tricentis, you can integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with different monitoring tools such as Dynatrace and New Relic, but that requires installing an additional tool to make that integration happen, rather than being able to pull in Tricentis NeoLoad from the different tools and servers, and make integration simpler and easier."
"It is easier to comprehend the analysis on its on-premise setup but not on its on-cloud setup."
"LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."
"There were some features that were lacking in Tricentis NeoLoad, e.g. those were more into Citrix and other complicated protocols, which were supported easily by a competitor: Micro Focus LoadRunner. We also need to look into how it integrates with other Tricentis products, because Tricentis did not have a good performance testing tool until now."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"Connecting with the solution's technical support can be time-consuming. The turnaround time for a ticket raised is around 72 hours, which becomes an issue when working on a huge project in our company."
"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."
"Tosca's reporting features could be better. Tricentis had a reporting tool called Analytics, but it didn't function properly after they reworked it. After that, they tried a new approach with key-tracing, and that didn't work."
"Many times when we have raised a ticket, we did not get an urgent response."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"I would like a better user interface."
Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 61 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 98 reviews. Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, BlazeMeter and Tricentis Flood, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Eggplant Test.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
