Senior Consultant at Cofomo
Video Review
Consultant
Production people can quickly reboot the server with ESXi Quick Boot
Pros and Cons
  • "Production people can quickly reboot the server with ESXi Quick Boot."
  • "I would like more Amazon stuff inside of VMware."

What is our primary use case?

We are an IT consulting company who serves and sells IT services.

I am using the last version to understand the new features. Also, we are using it to improve our code for our VMware clients.

We are also using on VMware cloud on AWS inside POC.

How has it helped my organization?

It is very simple to manage.

Some of the benefits that we have seen are:

  • HTML5
  • Web Client
  • It is fast and available.
  • It works well and is reliable.
  • The ESXi Quick Book is a good new feature because production people can quickly reboot the server, where previously it took a long time.
  • There is no need to have an iSCSI client. Some people use it, but the industry is moving to HTML5 clients.

I am testing more products and advising my clients about what they should do and implement with the newest version of VMware.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are:

  • ESXi Quick Boot
  • VM encryption
  • New security features.

The new feature announced today with vSphere Update 1 inside vSan is impressive. I did not have a chance to test Update 1 yet. We shall see how it performs in the next few days.

Because my server is too old, I am using my own lab for TPM. I did not have a good chance to test everything. VM encryption is quite simple to implement: Just check two boxes and it is done. It is very easy to do. If you want to move from on-premise to cloud, it is quite easy.

What needs improvement?

I put information on my blog stating that I would like more Amazon stuff inside of VMware. They have announced many thing that I am looking for today, so I am happy.

Buyer's Guide
VMware vSphere
May 2024
Learn what your peers think about VMware vSphere. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is very impressive. VMware develops many stable products. That is why we participate in the beta product testing to make things better.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is very impressive. As usual, VMware is able to scale out and up all their solutions.

How are customer service and support?

I do use the technical support, and so do my clients who receive good support. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did use in the past Hyper-V, KVM and XEN. I do prefer VMware for the maturity of their  solutions. VMware is also available inside all big cloud provider like Azure, AWS, Alibaba and IBM.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very straightforward. There isn't any complexity unless you have very old servers, then you won't be able to install the latest version of VMware 6.7 because of TPM.

What about the implementation team?

VMWare is one of the most used solution all around the world, it is easy to found some expertise on the market. Ask for a VMware certified person like VCP ou VCAP this will garanty a good knowledge of your tech support.

What was our ROI?

Our ROI is good. 

There is an average performance boost, especially if you use VM encryption inside the VMware with another product, like McAfee. You will see great improvement in these cases.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price is high, but you get a lot functionnality included with the product. You can also start with the free version of ESXi.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I am using many solutions: IBM PowerVM, Hyper-V, Acropolis, and VMware.

VMware is the most natural product on the market at the moment, especially in virtualization. The other products are quite good too. I am not saying you can use them, because you can. They are stable now. However, with VMware, you receive more feature than with the others.

What other advice do I have?

Think about your business needs, afterwards choose the product. Write down your needs on paper in bullets, then the solution will be clear and you can justify choosing VMware, not Hyper-V.

I would rate this solution as a nine out of 10. There is always space for improvement. 

Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: It depends on the business's need. That is all. I am a consultant and must know what my client needs. If they want a Rolls Royce, I give them a Rolls Royce. If they want a Honda Civic, I give them a Honda Civic. I must know the products to fit them to the customer's needs. I don't sell too much, just what the customer wants.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
IT Systems Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Being able to dynamically allocate memory and processors has boosted performance
Pros and Cons
  • "We have seen a performance boost because we have been able to more dynamically allocate either memory or processors."
  • "It's a very nice tool to be able to reduce your footprint, consolidate servers, and accumulate several servers in a high-density configuration."
  • "Workloads; We use vSphere for mission-critical apps including SAP and and part of our internal development in C+, for the solution that collects everything for the buyers."
  • "Performance; We have seen a performance boost because we have been able to more dynamically allocate either memory or processors."

    What is our primary use case?

    We're virtualizing the whole infrastructure of the company. We are only keeping some of the bigger servers as bare metal, but aside from that, everything is being virtualized.

    We use vSphere for mission-critical apps including SAP and part of our internal development in C+, for the solution that collects everything for the buyers.

    How has it helped my organization?

    We have seen a performance boost because we have been able to more dynamically allocate either memory or processors.

    It has provided us with cost reductions, a little bit more speed in deploying servers, and, of course, consolidation.

    What is most valuable?

    It's a very nice tool to be able to reduce your footprint, consolidate servers, and accumulate several servers in a high-density configuration.

    It's pretty simple to manage.

    What needs improvement?

    It's simple enough right now, but some more automation tools would definitely make it simpler.

    It's pretty well integrated with vROps but the integration could be improved a little bit. 

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    It's pretty stable. We have a wide variety of versions, starting from 4.5 all the way up to 6.5. They all work together and it's pretty stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    It's simple to scale and the upgrades are pretty simple as well. The upgrades were straightforward. We just installed a new HPC and GN and we deployed everything in there.

    However, I prefer to erase completely and reinstall, from the top.

    How is customer service and technical support?

    We have Premium Support and they're excellent.

    What was our ROI?

    We see a high return on investment, precisely because of the higher density hardware. We're using fewer hypervisors, which results in some return. We also have more virtual servers and less cost. Everything goes hand-in-hand.

    What other advice do I have?

    Analyze your infrastructure first, see what you want to do, and then start deploying everything from zero.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    VMware vSphere
    May 2024
    Learn what your peers think about VMware vSphere. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Senior Manager Systems/Network, Global Information Systems at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    We can easily pull reports and give access to people to look at specs or performance metrics
    Pros and Cons
    • "Visibility: We can easily pull reports and give access to other people to look at specs or performance metrics."
    • "When it comes to cross-regional (e.g., someone in the US managing the China vSphere implementations), it can be a somewhat slow. I would recommend increasing the speed. While there has already been improvement there, I would like to see more."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use it to manage multi-site, multi-regional implementations of VMware. We use the security end roles to give different tiers of access from the VM up to the VMware installation. We manage the roles and responsibilities within the security to do this. 

    We do all the functionality inside vSphere. We use VMotion and DRS to manage some of our licensing issues that we have. With bigger software vendors, like Oracle, we use it to keep licenses and requirements compliant and keep VMs running on specific hardware. 

    We use it for quite a few daily tasks: cloning and testing out patching. Then, we can perform snapshots through vSphere. 

    How has it helped my organization?

    Visibility: We can easily pull reports and give access to other people to look at specs or performance metrics. This came as a bonus to us. Yet, we have been using it for quite a long time (12 to 13 years). 

    The solution is simple and efficient to manage. It has brought ease of use to employees who are not at a senior level. It has been able to expose minimal tasks which can relieve some of my senior guys to do engineering tasks, as opposed to help desk, reboots, restarts, etc. We have been able to pass some of those tasks along. 

    What is most valuable?

    The ability to segregate roles and responsibilities, as well as regions. For example, I can give access to my Chinese team to manage the China servers and hosts. On the other hand, I could give access to my Canadian team to manage global VMware installations. Therefore, I like the flexibility of this tool.

    We have just migrated most of our SQL and enterprise databases to vSphere. We don't use it for Oracle, but we do for most other things. We also use it for our communications exchange link, etc. Therefore, it is pretty business critical when it comes to the back office support and server implementations.

    What needs improvement?

    There has been a lot of improvement with UI: its speed and usability features. Before, it was very slow. When it comes to cross-regional (e.g., someone in the US managing the China vSphere implementations), it can be a somewhat slow. I would recommend increasing the speed. While there has already been improvement there, I would like to see more.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    More than five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I haven't had any real issues. In the very beginning, there were some issues when upgrading or migrating from versions. However, our last upgrade was 5.5 to 6.5 where went from Windows to the Linux OVF version, and we did not have any issues with it. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    It is easy to scale and obtain as much power as we need. It is easy to provision and join it to the cluster. We haven't had any issues or limitations.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Technical support is very good. I haven't used them in quite some time though, because we have on-staff VMware experts. When I did use them a long time ago for compatibility with network cards (we use FCoE, which is not the industry standard), they were pretty quick to link us back to some articles to help us resolve our issues. 

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    When I first came on board, they had a very small implementation of Citrix. The servers at that time would cost 20K per application. They didn't allow us to centrally manage any systems. There would be a hodgepodge of vendors and versions of hardware. Therefore, it was a more difficult to track. When I came on board, we were maybe 20 to 30 percent virtualized. Since then, we're probably 99 percent virtualized. This did reduce staffing costs.

    The APIs and plugins are important. We used to use NetApp. We use now InfiniteApp and Compellent. Having these types of plugins and using their APIs in the storage subsystems, allows general admins to provision storage easily, as opposed to being a storage admin. It has alleviated having to have five to 10 storage admins. We consolidated to one or two storage admins, while having the others be able to provision their own storage. 

    What was our ROI?

    We are spending less on buying bigger machines, which are overprovisioned. Thus, the ROI is found in consolidation and cost savings.

    There are a lot of management and soft skills that we end up being able to save on. For example, my engineers in Canada could watch over systems in China, California, and Phoenix. Thus, it gives us the flexibility of administration. 

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We evaluated Hyper-V four or five years ago. They weren't as fast to develop technologies or even adopting the technology. There were some tools missing. Also, they were less innovative than VMware. Now, I think Microsoft has caught up a bit. However, it seems that VMware is putting a lot more R&D money into the product. So, we've been happy. We haven't had a need to leave.

    What other advice do I have?

    • Look at the market and see what is supportable. How long can you support the product. VMware has the history. It has the people who can support it in the industry. 
    • Look at the supportability of it. Look at the job market and how many people, from a staffing perspective, can support it. 
    • Then, look at the cost, because I don't think cost is everything.

    Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: They are a leader and more innovative than the competitors.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Director, Windows Server Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    Gives us high-availability, easier management, and a lower cost of support
    Pros and Cons
    • "The most valuable features are its flexibility and the ability to move workload."
    • "Scalability is the big advantage of it. The product itself allows us to scale on the fly as we need it, and plan for the future."

      What is our primary use case?

      We use it for virtualization of approximately 90 percent of all of our computing. In terms of mission-critical apps, quite honestly we use it for the majority of them on the banking side: our financial apps, loan accounting, loan origination, etc.

      How has it helped my organization?

      We have seen performance boosts for our mission-critical apps, with the ability to add compute at any time. We've been using this for so many years, so over that time we have probably seen performance increases of three to four times. As compute has increased we've been able to offer that to the apps. I don't know that I can give you a total percentage increase but it's a lot.

      Other benefits include high-availability, uptime, management is a lot easier, and a lower cost of support but with increased availability. That's a win.

      What is most valuable?

      The most valuable features are its flexibility and the ability to move workload.

      The built-in security features, such as VM Encryption and support for TPM and VBS, are all important for us, but I can't go into specifics about them.

      It's also simple and efficient to manage. It's a complex environment but it is one that we can get our staff trained on, it's not like a one-off environment.

      What needs improvement?

      In terms of additional features I would like to see, I just heard about them here at VMworld 2018. They're rolling in security to be a core feature. Built-in app defense is something we'll take advantage of. The ability to utilize tools that are in the cloud - we don't really use the cloud - will be available for use on-premise, and that is a pretty big feature.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      More than five years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      The stability has been huge for us. We have a very predictable environment, robust, fault-tolerant. It's great.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      Scalability is the big advantage of it. The product itself allows us to scale on the fly as we need it, and plan for the future.

      How are customer service and technical support?

      We are a Business Critical Support customer, so we have an engineer dedicated to our team. We use them on a day-to-day basis.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      We didn't have a previous solution. We just had challenges that everybody was faced with and VMware, back in its core, back in its early days, had the capability to move compute from one data center to another and that was huge. We wanted to be able to do things in a secure, safe manner with low risk.

      How was the initial setup?

      I was involved in the initial setup, back in 2005. Back then it was fairly complex but that's because we were early adopters of it.

      What was our ROI?

      I don't know that I can give you a number, but our ROI has been significant.

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      At that time, VMware was an innovator in this technology so it was a question of learning more about what they offered and taking advantage of it.

      What other advice do I have?

      If you're not already looking at vSphere, you're probably behind. I don't really have any colleagues who aren't utilizing this product.

      I rate this solution as a nine out of 10 because I think you can always improve. But it's a tremendous product. We consider VMware a partner, we work with them closely.

      Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
      PeerSpot user
      it_user127791 - PeerSpot reviewer
      IT Representative at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
      Vendor
      VMware pays for itself with the increase in efficiency. With ESXi make sure the hardware matches the compatibility list.

      What is most valuable?

      The ability to maximize the use of existing hardware resources and run multiple servers at the same time.

      How has it helped my organization?

      Without too much detail, we use the ESXi Server to host our SBS for DNS, DHCP, and Exchange in conjunction with another server the is used to run our file share. We have another ESXi we use in our test environment that has worked out in not only pretesting certain configurations, but also we use it to recover data from, say, an infected hard drive. We simply grab an image of the drive, restore it to the virtual machine while isolating the network connectivity and perform all solutions and testing that may be needed.

      What needs improvement?

      At this time and with the way we use it, none.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      The company has been using the solution for a couple of years now.

      What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

      Yes. With ESXi one must make sure the hardware that is used matches the compatibility list provided by vmware. Once the host machine is configured appropriately, it's smooth sailing.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      Amazingly, no. All is stable with the host, and the VM's whether Windows XP, 7 Pro x86/x64, 8, 8.1, and Linux.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      I think the only limitations with scalability are related to the ESXi host machine itself. If it is not configured with enough horsepower, then it wont be very scalable. However a simple machine with an intel i7 processor, z87 chip-set, Intel nic cards, and 32 gigs of ram has the ability to run multiple servers with ease and speed.

      How are customer service and technical support?

      Customer Service: I have not needed to contact their customer service.Technical Support: Support has been self driven via research and VMWare's web site. Being that ESXi is free, the support is great.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      Previous to the current environment. I was dabbling with virtualbox. Awesome software but the application for it is different because its small scale and does not optimize its usage of the hardware its running on. It can crash windows.

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial setup was fairly easy ONCE the correct/compatible hardware is set up for the host machine. I found the learning curve very minor, as well.

      What about the implementation team?

      The initial setup was performed by our IT consultant. The consultant then showed me how it works and configuration that one can do. I also dove deep into research on ESXi. I would say the level of expertise about 7 on a scale of one to ten because of the way we use it.

      What was our ROI?

      Well I am not in the accounting office, but I would "guestimate" that it pays for itself with the increase in efficiency, the ability to circumvent the need to have a ratio of 1 machine for every server, and it doesn't crash.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      I built the machine for the test environment we have in-house. The machine ran about $700.00 over all. Day to day cost is only that of the electricity used to run it. The 4 other ESXi hosts were built before I arrived. I can estimate the cost about $400 each plus the OS's (SBS, Win2008r2, etc, etc) to build and to run daily is again only the cost of the electricity.

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      I came into the environment where it was already in place. Despite that fact, I have test drove Hyper-V and virtual box to compare and get a feel for which is best. I am a believer in VMWare.

      What other advice do I have?

      Plan, plan, plan. Always plan out your network changes, test those changes, implement, monitor, and note take along the way. Aside from that, do it.
      Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
      PeerSpot user
      Stefano Panigada - PeerSpot reviewer
      Specialist SE Manager at Dell EMC
      Real User
      A stable and scalable solution that brings the benefits of flexibility and mobility
      Pros and Cons
      • "The fact that you can use all the CPU and memory power that the server can provide is most valuable. In a physical server, you might end up not using all the physical resources. There are a lot of benefits, such as flexibility and mobility, in virtualizing computes."
      • "The improvement is more from a licensing perspective rather than from a feature functionality perspective. There could be more flexibility and fewer model options to make it easier to sell. Today, there are so many different options available, and sometimes, it is not really clear which one is the right version or the right model to propose."

      What is our primary use case?

      It is a compute virtualization software. It is mainly used to virtualize physical servers and deploy virtual machines on top of virtual servers. So, instead of having one workload per server, you can have multiple workloads.

      What is most valuable?

      The fact that you can use all the CPU and memory power that the server can provide is most valuable. In a physical server, you might end up not using all the physical resources. There are a lot of benefits, such as flexibility and mobility, in virtualizing computes.

      What needs improvement?

      The improvement is more from a licensing perspective rather than from a feature functionality perspective. There could be more flexibility and fewer model options to make it easier to sell. Today, there are so many different options available, and sometimes, it is not really clear which one is the right version or the right model to propose. 

      For how long have I used the solution?

      We have been providing this solution to our customers for 15 years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      It is definitely stable.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      It is scalable. In our country, I believe 50% of the customers are running vSphere virtualization.

      How are customer service and support?

      I don't have experience with their technical support. 

      How was the initial setup?

      I never did an installation, but as per my understanding, it is straightforward.

      The number of people required for installation and maintenance really depends on the scale of the project. Usually, one engineer can deploy vSphere very easily.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      It depends on the contract they have with VMware.

      What other advice do I have?

      I can recommend this solution. I would rate it at least an eight out of 10.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
      PeerSpot user
      Senior Infrastructure Solutions Specialist at Fiber Misr
      Real User
      Good virtualization and optimization in an easy to use solution
      Pros and Cons
      • "Good virtualization and ability to optimize and deliver an automated and orchestrated cloud platform on-prem."
      • "Higher cost than other similar solutions."

      What is our primary use case?

      We deliver this solution to our customers and we partner with the vendor. I'm a senior infrastructure solution specialist. 

      What is most valuable?

      This is a straightforward solution, there's not much troubleshooting required and the work around it is quite simple. I particularly like the virtualization and the ability of the solution to optimize and deliver an automated and orchestrated cloud platform on-prem. They regularly surprise us with great features developed by a very, very sharp R&D team that delivers up-to-date technology with more features and more valuable ideas to enhance and automate the platform with data center.

      What needs improvement?

      If you're converting from any other virtualization system to VMware, you will note that the price is significantly higher. 

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I've been using this solution for 10 years. 

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      The solution is scalable to an unlimited number of hosts.

      How are customer service and technical support?

      Technical support is very helpful. They don't deliver the troubleshooting directly, but they understand and collect the logs and provide the procedure to follow in order to reach a solution.

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial setup is straightforward. VMware is a very, very easy system to implement and to administer, as long as you have at least some sort of experience. You don't need to be an expert but those who have a high-level knowledge of VMware can manage and deliver the crucial tasks. 

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      There are different licensing costs depending on whether you're using the standard or enterprise solution. A socket in the standard solution might cost $1,000 whereas it would cost $4,000 for the enterprise socket. 

      What other advice do I have?

      I rate this solution a nine out of 10. 

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
      PeerSpot user
      Sr. Architect, Business Continuity at Sayers
      MSP
      Has Distributed vSwitches to better manage networking across large infrastructures
      Pros and Cons
      • "The ability of a running VM to be quickly relocated to another hypervisor or launched at another site via replicated storage greatly reduces downtime."
      • "The ability to run ARM based VMs on an x86 platform for testing purposes. With the growing use of SBCs running on ARM architectures for IoT devices, it would be very useful if developers could build and deploy VMs running operating systems like Raspbian used on Raspberry Pi devices on their existing x86 ESXi environments. Even if this is not possible through some form of emulation, the ability to add ARM hypervisors to vSphere environments would be very useful. This will enable more rapid development cycles for customers just getting started with IoT but already existing vSphere users."

      What is our primary use case?

      I'm a Solutions Architect. I advise clients on how to leverage VMware products to provide resiliency in the face of disruptive events. VMware's platform is the most robust for running VMs upon, and it also has the most mature technology. Therefore, it is much more reliable and predictable, and those are the key characteristics needed to ensure a successful business continuity solution. Bleeding edge newcomers have yet to prove themselves production worthy compared to VMware's long history of success.

      How has it helped my organization?

      Portability of infrastructure is the greatest asset of any virtualization platform. By using VMware solutions, there is no lock-in with a particular hardware vendor for compute, network, or storage needs. Likewise, the ability to run various guest operating systems further amplifies that flexibility. The overwhelming majority of my clients are able to use VMware's solutions for 100 percent of their software application needs. Finally, the ability of a running VM to be quickly relocated to another hypervisor or launched at another site via replicated storage greatly reduces downtime.

      What is most valuable?

      • Storage vMotion to safely migrate VMs to other hypervisors, storage solutions and sites while the VM is still running. 
      • Distributed vSwitches to better manage networking across large infrastructures. 
      • vRealize for operations management and automation to remove human error from complex tasks and enable more efficient processes and business activities. 
      • The VCSA appliance provides a great interface for most management tasks. 

      In general, the combination of VMware products that compose or plug into vSphere enable most organizations to better prepare for disruptive events.

      What needs improvement?

      The ability to run ARM based VMs on an x86 platform for testing purposes. With the growing use of SBCs running on ARM architectures for IoT devices, it would be very useful if developers could build and deploy VMs running operating systems like Raspbian used on Raspberry Pi devices on their existing x86 ESXi environments. Even if this is not possible through some form of emulation, the ability to add ARM hypervisors to vSphere environments would be very useful. This will enable more rapid development cycles for customers just getting started with IoT but already existing vSphere users. 

      For how long have I used the solution?

      Since 1999 when they only made Workstation.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      I've used Hyper-V, AHV, VirtualBox and KVM solutions. Each of these solutions has merits, but none of them are as flexible and reliable as VMware solutions. They are all rapidly improving, but are not being adopted widely enough to rival vSphere's dominance. I rarely advise clients to switch away from a VMware based solution, because of the long history of success and reliability that comes with it.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      Do not buy based on price alone. Many of my customers chose the lowest cost option only to discover that the additional funds needed to access even a few more features would have been money well spent. Likewise, if you are going to spend more money on additional features, then have a plan to actually deploy and integrate those features into your infrastructure. Many customers never take full advantage of the many features that they are paying for and that can be avoided by being proactive in developing your overall vision for the infrastructure.

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      I am constantly evaluating many solutions. I also regularly re-evaluate other solutions. The competition is improving, and VMware has done a great job improving as well.

      Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are a VMware reseller.
      PeerSpot user
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free VMware vSphere Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
      Updated: May 2024
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free VMware vSphere Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.