We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and IBM Rational DOORS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately."
"I really like the customization that can be done using the DOORS Extension Language (DXL)."
"The program is very stable."
"It is a mature product that is stable."
"Very customizable and can be as powerful as you want it to be."
"I like the way we can simply link requirements with one another and with test descriptions and then automatically produce reports that are required to show compliance to our customers. It is a combination of requirements management and reporting that I like, but I really have very little to do with the reporting part of it. I don't know how easy or hard it is to create those reports."
"The data logs are ver conveneint."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is traceability. We can track every requirement, including what the stakeholder must do and component-level requirements."
"The solution is stable."
"3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities."
"Overall, the user experience should be enhanced."
"Not all Rational Team Concert operations are available from the web client. Certain operations, like creating streams or components, still require using the desktop application. They're not accessible through the web interface. And in my opinion, this limitation should be removed."
"The images are not clear. We have to use them as OLE objects. And in the testing part, I'm not sure how to link it with it. This is my main concern."
"The problem is that because the GUI is so bad, you either have to spend a lot of money customizing the interface yourself, or a lot of money on training."
"It's difficult to set the code on the solution."
"The low performance of the solution is probably because it is quite an old tool."
"Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want."
"I would like to see them improve in agile management the Scrum/Kanban Board to work with overseas team members."
3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews. 3SL Cradle is rated 8.0, while IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". 3SL Cradle is most compared with Jira, whereas IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and OpenText Dimensions RM. See our 3SL Cradle vs. IBM Rational DOORS report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.