We performed a comparison between Adobe Commerce and SAP Commerce Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two eCommerce Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."On the plus side, when you build everything from scratch in Magento, you can do magic with it."
"It provides AI features, including a tool called Insight for AI-driven product recommendations."
"Magento provides a strong backing, meaning it can handle the order processing, customer management, configuration, third party payment integration, and shipping matters. There is a standard, very well set up architecture already present in Magento that helps them set up their online shops with much precision. Clients can see their reports, their daily sales, their best selling products, and their best buying customers so that they can target them through mails or just follow up with them. These are the main default features which make Magento so attractive."
"Magento is very flexible, and it's one of the biggest e-commerce platforms."
"The customization capabilities of Adobe Commerce are great."
"The most valuable feature in this solution I have found to be that I have the ability to find all the analytics that I need. It has very good integrations with social media platforms and other tools."
"Magento has changed over the years, but one of the most interesting aspects is that it gets the job done, and a vast community of experts is knowledgeable about the solution."
"We have the ability to resolve service issues since Magento enables us to invest more time in dealing with custom requirements."
"We like that this solution gives our B2B clients a lot of functionality straight 'out of the box', meaning that they don't need to carry out a lot of configuration to be able to use it."
"SAP Hybris provides us with all of the e-commerce features that a client could need."
"Some of the most valuable features are its personalized offering, promotion engine, and customer support module."
"I chose this out-of-box E-Commerce solution because it helps you start up your E-Commerce business in a very good amount of time since Hybris already provides you the end-to-end flow with minimum customization. You can quickly go live with the customer."
"The user interface can be customized."
"If you have a client and they want to have an e-commerce project that is based on solid principles, you don't need too much time to develop it."
"Its dashboards, business features, and user-friendliness of a lot of business interfaces are valuable. We work on B2B projects, and it is the most efficient software solution for B2B. The B2B accelerator is very much appreciated by our customers because it has some use cases that are ready for production. For some projects, we proposed the SAP Hybris solution because it was sufficient for use cases related to product management and data quality. With other e-commerce platforms, we would have needed integration with another product information management software."
"Hybris offers a platform designed for speed."
"The performance is a bottleneck in Magento and there is a lot of room for improvement in this regard."
"Should have a way to communicate properly with the team that builds the platform"
"The solution’s performance could be improved."
"The hardware requirements of the tool should be made better, as it is a solution that is very heavy on the servers, and it makes it expensive to host many servers."
"Magneto is monolithic in character, making it difficult for us to scale up very high quickly on the content side."
"The industry has evolved, and the main focus is composable solutions because of which now SAP and Magento are forced to tackle various aspects of commerce, including commerce tools and pricing strategies, among other things."
"I'm not a technical person, but we had some kind of late response in page loading, let's say page load speed."
"I am still playing around and trying to catch up with the latest version to understand all the features, but I do feel that its CMS can be much more streamlined. They provide a what-you-see-is-what-you-get editor, which many customers prefer, but based on the implementations that I have done for more than seven years, I have seen that many times, it is run by the marketing team, and they don't find it very comfortable to use. They feel uncomfortable managing and changing the content. As a business user, you need to have at least basic knowledge of HTML, which you cannot expect from all marketing teams. Some companies or organizations have that competency, but many organizations, especially in the Middle East, have a very small team, so it becomes quite difficult for them. This is a common challenge that I have seen across the platforms. Magento is better and easier than Oracle Commerce Cloud, but Shopify is much easier than Magento. A layman or my 10-year-old kid can go ahead and set up a store in Shopify in probably 45 minutes, which is not the case with Magento. Elasticsearch has really been a pain. It takes a toll on the performance. Starting with version 2.4, Magento requires Elasticsearch, which has been causing a lot of serious performance issues. We had a client in the US who was running a promo, and they lost a subsequent number of orders over one and a half hours. They were on the enterprise platform, not open-source. The team had to open a ticket with Magento. Its performance needs to be upgraded, or some kind of guidelines have to be provided for the setup. It looks like even Magento has no clue. When you go through the answers given in the online community, it seems that in spite of having the hardware configurations that they suggest, it is not performing at the optimal level. It should also have a better way to measure performance. Performance measuring has to be much easier. Many times, we see CPU utilization going up and down. We see spikes without any reason. Therefore, we need a better performance management system."
"It is very expensive to implement, which is why many companies who can't afford would normally move to Salesforce or Magento."
"Hybris is not currently using microservices."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the product search. There will be multiple criteria to search products and there will be a number of products in different categories. The question is how soon can I find the product which I'm looking for. The search can be improved."
"They could include additional types of payment implementations. Right now they are just providing CyberSourse."
"The solution is complex due to the rapid development of new features in SAP Commerce, which requires the changing of older technologies and migration to new ones."
"SAP Commerce needs to have a credit limit like Salesforce. Currently, we have to do the coding and customization and then showcase it to the user."
"The learning curve is high."
"The stack needs to be improved; they need to start using more new technologies."
Adobe Commerce is ranked 3rd in eCommerce Platforms with 25 reviews while SAP Commerce Cloud is ranked 2nd in eCommerce Platforms with 18 reviews. Adobe Commerce is rated 8.2, while SAP Commerce Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Commerce writes "An extremely flexible and highly scalable platform offering exceptional customer support to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Commerce Cloud writes "A scalable tool that can be integrated with any platform ". Adobe Commerce is most compared with Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Shopify, Oracle ATG, HCL Digital Commerce and Oracle Commerce Cloud, whereas SAP Commerce Cloud is most compared with Shopify, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Oracle ATG, HCL Digital Commerce and Oracle Commerce Cloud. See our Adobe Commerce vs. SAP Commerce Cloud report.
See our list of best eCommerce Platforms vendors.
We monitor all eCommerce Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.