We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Oracle Java Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The installation is quite straightforward."
"Amazon AWS contains a lot of helpful services."
"The solution can scale well."
"I like the flexibility of this solution."
"The solution has very good Lambda functions within AWS."
"The product's scalability is good."
"The solution offers easy provisioning and scaling on the fly."
"Amazon AWS has improved a lot on security and is very good. Additionally, You can integrate your own security into their AWS platform."
"Cloud has provided less maintenance."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."
"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."
"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."
"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."
"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."
"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."
"Their support can be improved. In some cases, their support is not as proficient as it can be. They should be quicker at getting back."
"They can launch the Oracle service in Azure, and we expect that this should be possible in Amazon AWS as well."
"The networking models used in AWS, while functional, do have room for improvement. This is especially the fact, considering that they are built/presented from a systems perspective."
"We like everything about the solution except for the general price."
"The customization could improve. However, it depends on the customization needed."
"Some of the storage services could be cheaper."
"The price could be better."
"The security right now needs improvement. It's not bad, per se. It's just that there's always room for improvement in security."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."
"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."
"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Oracle Java Cloud Service is ranked 19th in PaaS Clouds with 15 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Oracle Java Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Java Cloud Service writes "User-friendly code development solution needing enhancements addressing glitches". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Oracle Java Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and Microsoft Azure. See our Amazon AWS vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.