We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance of AWS is excellent."
"The scalability is a valuable feature."
"We like the that, within the public subnet of this solution, a new instance of the tool is launched when it detects an issue, in order to prevent interruptions in performance."
"The product is nice and stable. Its performance is great."
"Serverless computing: This can be more cost-efficient just regarding computing resources than renting or purchasing a fixed quantity of servers, which involves periods of underutilization or nonuse."
"It's very easy to use."
"User friendly solution."
"It is easy to spin up resources."
"The BTP module is important for digital transformations."
"The interface is easy to manage."
"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."
"The processes and the way we take advantage and use assistance are good."
"This solution is as good as any other S/4HANA SAP solution. The continuous support we get is very valuable."
"It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."
"One of the features that I've found most useful is that It's very simple. They take care of the technical aspects of the data, installations, patches."
"There's a minimum amount of downtime when using the solution. This platform is very effective."
"An integrated platform would make it easier for administrators to monitor and manage."
"It could be made cheaper. I know we spend a lot of money each month on AWS."
"As far as the automation is concerned, the backups should be scaled."
"The pricing is something you have to watch. You really have to constantly optimize your costs for instances and things like that. That can become a job in itself to manage just from a budgeting standpoint."
"Its interface could be better because there are so many services right now in the product that it is quite difficult to navigate around in this. Its interface could be a subject of improvement."
"We like everything about the solution except for the general price."
"The solution could have better security and more integration with other platforms."
"The customization could be improved."
"The cost could be improved. I think it's higher than the competition."
"The main thing is that SAP needs to give better response times for support tickets."
"SAP support isn't on par with products like Microsoft Azure or AWS. It's nowhere close to the competitors."
"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."
"This product is not mature enough at this point in time."
"The SAP products are complicated to deploy anywhere."
"It’s a common challenge with applications like Microsoft and SAP that they tend to rely on engineers rather than human resources personnel for knowledge and implementation."
"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, Microsoft Azure, Red Hat OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP S4HANA on AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS. See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.