We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and VMware Tanzu Application Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon AWS has improved a lot on security and is very good. Additionally, You can integrate your own security into their AWS platform."
"Amazon AWS is very stable."
"Amazon for DevOps is fantastic. Amazon has fast clouds, and the process and the Dev is very good."
"I especially like the flexibility and scalability of the solution."
"The scalability of the product is the solution's most valuable feature."
"We have many projects where we can resolve a lot of issues with Amazon AWS. It has given customers a lot of visibility with their data. Many customers do not know what they can learn from their data and I provide them with this using useful information using Amazon AWS."
"The performance of AWS is excellent."
"The installation and initial setup are easy."
"Tanzu is easy to upgrade and scale, whether we're talking about horizontal or vertical scaling. It is as smooth as possible without any downtime. The platform maintenance, upgrading, and operations part is very smooth."
"The solution is integrated very well with a lot of other systems. Also, its GUI is very good."
"There are a lot of services available in VMware Tanzu Application Service, such as databases and application servers. You have everything you need in one application and you do not need to search outside of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ability to check the flow of all the different variants within our applications."
"The customization could be improved."
"There's a huge cost for support."
"I would like to receive some alerts when my consumption is getting out of the normal range."
"As a result of the competency, I believe that most people are now leaning toward Azure rather than AWS."
"Some services which were easy to use through shortcuts are now more complicated to use."
"Integration with in-house applications could be simplified."
"AWS is very expensive."
"A person with no AWS experience might find it overwhelming at first."
"The implementation is not easy, it is very complex and can take a day or two to complete."
"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The solution could benefit from improved customization and visibility for its users."
"Tanzu could provide more granular control over whatever networking is being done on the containers. I would also like to see a slightly more detailed view of application-level tracing. I'm referring to the connections between different microservices. If they added a service-matching feature, that would be helpful for the customers to build or be more effective."
"The solution is currently focused on VMware infrastructure and I would like to see more options made available."
More VMware Tanzu Application Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while VMware Tanzu Application Service is ranked 12th in PaaS Clouds with 4 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while VMware Tanzu Application Service is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Application Service writes "A solution with a good GUI and the ability to integrate with other systems seamlessly". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, Microsoft Azure, Red Hat OpenShift and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas VMware Tanzu Application Service is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Red Hat OpenShift, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Google Cloud and Cloud Foundry. See our Amazon AWS vs. VMware Tanzu Application Service report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.