We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services."The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3."
"AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."
"The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us."
"Data retrieval, security, compliance, and storage archiving are the most valuable features of Amazon S3 Glacier."
"The reliability of storage is the main benefit."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a very cheap storage, where we store infrequently used data."
"We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."
"The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier."
"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."
"The user experience must be improved."
"The tool could be made cheaper."
"The product is difficult to use."
"I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features."
"The product’s pricing must be improved."
"Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out."
"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS writes "Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is most compared with .
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.