We performed a comparison between Anaplan and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Production Planning solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution scales well."
"The best thing is that it's very intuitive and user-friendly. You don't need coding skills to manipulate the platform."
"Technical support has been good."
"It's highly flexible. If you've got a complex environment with complex calculations, you can build that out. So that's a really good positive."
"Anaplan's in-memory calculation engine is super-fast compared to the old tools we previously used. You enter the data and everything shows up in one go."
"I am impressed with the tool’s real-time calculations and intuitive interface. The tool’s user interface is the best compared to other software that I have worked with. I also find the tool’s management reporting feature valuable."
"It's simple to use with a lot of functions."
"The most valuable feature of Anaplan is machine learning. The solution is constantly evolving from feedback. Additionally, there is a wide range of training material online."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"The price of the solution can improve."
"One area of improvement is conditional formatting. It's not very practical, and you need to specify additional formatting."
"Anaplan's workflow component is probably the biggest area for improvement. I'd also like to see Anaplan add an ad hoc reporting tool that allows users to query things. It's going to factor into how you design your data set and your models, but I'd like the ability to create ad hoc queries against the data that's in there."
"The integration technique should be a little bit easier."
"The solution can improve by providing an easier form of integration to different platforms, such as receiving data from different Salesforce. There is a process to do it through the use of some APIs but it could be made much easier. This would be a large help to us."
"The visualization tools in the product are limited in comparison to other reporting tools."
"The solution could improve by better dashboards and while entering the form loss and project implementation the ability to use graphical shapes more effectively."
"There are workspace issues, like the limitation on model sizes."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"The product’s pricing should be improved."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."
Anaplan is ranked 6th in Production Planning with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 2nd in Production Planning with 55 reviews. Anaplan is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Anaplan writes "Great for large-scale modelling, easy to learn, and very stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Anaplan is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Analytics Cloud and IBM Planning Analytics, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and PeopleSoft. See our Anaplan vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best Production Planning vendors.
We monitor all Production Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.