We performed a comparison between Anomali ThreatStream and Fortinet FortiSIEM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature I have found most valuable is credential monitoring. This feature is easy and quick."
"There are things like dashboards and reports (pre-configured and custom) that let me know that things are operating the way they should be, and when they are not."
"I like FortiSIEM because it integrates natively with our other Fortinet solutions and the Fortinet Fabric, but it also integrates with Cisco, Palo Alto and other security fabrics."
"The most valuable features for us are the built-in reports and alerts, along with the extreme flexibility in reporting and rule generation."
"We have many application systems, and I can set up Fortinet FortiSIEM for users to monitor their systems."
"The CMDB and the device discovery features are most valuable."
"FortiSIEM's log correlation is good."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard. CMDB database collects data from a lot of pre-configured devices."
"Less code in integration would be nice when building blocks."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM is a little out of sight and needs more marketing efforts to be popular in the market."
"I would like to see easier implementation in the future."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"Does not have load-sharing or high-availability, and these are important things to implement. I can do the same things in another way, but not naturally having these features makes it complicated."
"The nodes on our network did not comply with the SIEM solution. They use a different format parking log."
"FortiSIEM needs to expand its integration with third-party vendors. I don't know if Forcepoint has been added, but there were limited resources for integrating Forcepoint solutions when we implemented FortiSIEM. It integrates well with other Fortinet products and solutions from established cybersecurity companies like Palo Alto but doesn't integrate with some of the newer vendors."
"Not very good on non-API features, lacks that functionality."
"Network detection and response is a separate product."
Anomali ThreatStream is ranked 6th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 1 review while Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 10th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 65 reviews. Anomali ThreatStream is rated 7.0, while Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Anomali ThreatStream writes "Easy and quick credential monitoring; tech support could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". Anomali ThreatStream is most compared with Recorded Future, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), ThreatQ, Splunk Enterprise Security and Group-IB Threat Intelligence, whereas Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, Microsoft Sentinel and LogRhythm SIEM.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
