We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and Informatica Business Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best feature is the customization."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"Since Apache works very well on Python, we can manage everything and create pipelines there."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"Designing processes and workflows is easier, and it assists in coordinating all of the different processes."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"Development on Apache Airflow is really fast, and it's easy to use with the newer updates. Everything is in Python, so it's not hard to understand. They also have a graphical view, so if you are not a programmer and you are just an administrator, you can easily track everything and see if everything is working or not."
"There isn't any human touch involved. It's just an automated business process to build different applications and talking to various APIs using the client's ecosystems. We then build new functionalities out of it."
"Informatica Business Process Manager is easy to use and learn."
"I know that there are two good features, APN and ServiceNow but we haven't explored all of its features yet."
"The solution could be improved by simplifying the integration process."
"The dashboards could be enhanced."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"Enhancements become necessary when scaling it up from a few thousand workflows to a more extensive scale of five thousand or ten thousand workflows."
"We haven't had many technical issues. We don't use all of the components of the tool that are more complex and error-prone."
"I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while Informatica Business Process Manager is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while Informatica Business Process Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Business Process Manager writes "An easy-to-use solution for ETL purposes ". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration and IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas Informatica Business Process Manager is most compared with Camunda and Oracle BPM. See our Apache Airflow vs. Informatica Business Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.