We performed a comparison between Arista Campus LAN Switches and Cisco FabricPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."
"The CloudVision Portal allows us to centrally manage all of our Arista products."
"The feature sets are pretty cool. They've got almost everything that the competition offers."
"It's a reliable product and you know that it will work in the enterprise environment."
"We can also enhance our service line with disaster recovery."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to migrate VMs between data centers."
"The solution has excellent stability."
"As I mentioned earlier, the durability, flexibility, and security of Cisco devices are notable. Particularly with switches, the capability to implement multiple VLANs and easily aggregate the network has been advantageous. The ability to have different VLANs and aggregate the network without complications is a key feature of Cisco FabricPath."
"The technical support we get from Cisco is excellent. It's the best in the industry. We're more than satisfied with the level of service they provide."
"FabricPath's best features are routing, OSPS, ethernet, and performance."
"The best features of Cisco FabricPath is performance and reliability."
"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."
"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."
"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."
"Lack of security features for which we need to use another solution."
"The solution is complex to set up."
"The management features are in need of improvement."
"The cloud version of Cisco Fabric Path could be improved."
"Lacks sufficient integration with SIEM."
"In terms of the series, I find that the integration with other teleconferencing applications needs to be more seamless. I have suggested to Cisco that the endpoint device should allow joining calls from Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and other teleconferencing applications. Additionally, I appreciate the recent inclusion of breakout sessions in the Cisco Webex application, which enhances its relevance in the networking field."
"The price is a little bit too high."
"I would like one management console to control the network."
Earn 20 points
Arista Campus LAN Switches is ranked 13th in LAN Switching while Cisco FabricPath is ranked 8th in LAN Switching with 22 reviews. Arista Campus LAN Switches is rated 8.8, while Cisco FabricPath is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Arista Campus LAN Switches writes "Stable, has a lot of uplink interfaces, and several can be centralized managed through a single portal". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco FabricPath writes "Makes multi-layer networking easy and increases network efficiency". Arista Campus LAN Switches is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, whereas Cisco FabricPath is most compared with Juniper QFabric and Cisco Nexus. See our Arista Campus LAN Switches vs. Cisco FabricPath report.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.