We performed a comparison between Aruba Airwave and HPE Intelligent Management Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Management Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It contains valuable features for engineers to C-level executives, who want visibility, performance, statistics, and a platform which can take action for them without manual intervention, saving time and money."
"The Clarity feature makes it easy to use and understand what is going on with your network in a nice dashboard."
"This solution gives you a lot of reporting capabilities, and it has a very good interface."
"It's scalable because it's licensed per device and we bought licenses with each device. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability."
"What I like best about Aruba Airwave is its orchestration feature because it saves configuration time. I also like that it allows you to do ZTP installations for new Aruba equipment."
"AirWave definitely helps us troubleshoot and get to the root cause of the issues. It gives you an excellent indication of what's going on within your network at different locations. You can get to the area, take a look at the AirWave analysis, and make informed decisions."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"Aruba Airwave provides a robust solution for monitoring and configuring Wi-Fi networks."
"The most valuable feature is the interface and its ease of use."
"The most useful feature is infrastructure monitoring including switches and servers."
"It's a very complete product with a lot of functionality."
"One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations."
"I would like to see an integration of services into one system, rather than having multiple systems to do multiple things."
"We encounter delayed ETAs in the manufacturing of hardware."
"We're looking for more device compatibility. Like compatibility with third-party devices."
"The integration with other platforms like Cisco needs to be improved."
"The overall monitoring of this solution could be improved."
"Pricing for Aruba Airwave could be cheaper, which is an area for improvement in the solution."
"We sometimes have problems with troubleshooting between the GUI and the CLI manipulation."
"I would like to see is “AAS”. Not only Aruba APs with central, but NAC/ClearPass, AirWave, and everything licensed as a Service."
"The integration with other network devices needs improvement."
"HPE Intelligent Management Center is a bit slow."
"One notable deficiency is the lack of online support for the product."
"I would like to see additional modules included."
More HPE Intelligent Management Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Airwave is ranked 6th in Network Management Applications with 16 reviews while HPE Intelligent Management Center is ranked 7th in Network Management Applications with 6 reviews. Aruba Airwave is rated 8.4, while HPE Intelligent Management Center is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Airwave writes "The solution has multi-vendor support, and it can be used for network management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Intelligent Management Center writes "Efficient network management providing fast response times, user-friendly navigation and reliable performance monitoring". Aruba Airwave is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, Cisco Prime, Fortinet FortiManager, Huawei eSight and Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista, whereas HPE Intelligent Management Center is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, Cisco Prime, Huawei eSight, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager and DX Spectrum. See our Aruba Airwave vs. HPE Intelligent Management Center report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.